Abstract B12: The effects of Irinophore C™ on the microenvironment and vasculature of a primary orthotopic model of colorectal cancer.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Colorectal cancer is a common cancer that accounts for ∼10% of cancer cell deaths in North America. There are numerous in vivo xenograft models for colorectal cancer available, but in general, these are derived from immortalized cell lines and fail to capture the complexities and heterogeneity of tumors seen in the clinic. Our group has developed a series of orthotopic, primary tumors from samples of human colorectal cancer tissue obtained during surgical resection that maintain the characteristics of the original sample. The effects of Irinophore C™, (a liposomal formulation of irinotecan that is more efficacious and less toxic than the parent drug) on the microenvironment and vascular function of these primary colorectal tumors were examined in the present study. Materials and Methods: Primary tumor tissues, obtained from colorectal cancer patients, were validated by a reference pathologist and implanted subcutaneously in SCID mice. Small pieces of subcutaneous tumors that grew successfully were then passaged orthotopically on the ascending colon of new mice. When these tumors reached ∼200mm3, groups of mice were treated with vehicle control (0.9% saline), irinotecan (50mg/kg), or Irinophore C™ (25mg/kg) once a week for 6 weeks. Separate groups of tumors were harvested on days 3 and 42 after treatment started. Immunofluorescence staining was performed on tumor cryosections followed by computerized image analysis to determine levels of cell proliferation, apoptosis, hypoxia, and vessel density. Results: 4 of 14 samples were successfully propagated orthotopically and were characterized by a reference pathologist. The tumors maintain their original morphology, and one is a highly mucinous adenocarcinoma whereas the others are typical colorectal adenocarcinomas. Treatment with irinotecan and Irinophore C™ reduced tumor volumes by 54% and 92%, respectively, compared to the vehicle control. No toxic effects were seen with Irinophore C™. Immunostaining data showed that the distance between blood vessels remained the same for Irinotecan when compared to control, but increased with Irinophore C™ treatment (+30%; P<0.01). However, perfusion was not significantly different between the three treatment groups. Furthermore, compared to the vehicle treatment group, tumors treated with irinotecan are 42% (P<0.05) more necrotic and tumors treated with Irinophore C™ are 97% less hypoxic. Conclusion: An orthotopic model of colorectal cancer was successfully developed using patient tumor materials that retained the morphology of the primary tumor. Irinophore C™ was more effective in controlling tumor growth than irinotecan despite being delivered at a lower dose. In addition, treatment with Irinophore C™ appeared to improve overall vascular function in the tumor. Based on these data, it is clear that Irinophore C™ has different mechanisms of action and is more efficacious than irinotecan against primary models of colorectal cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B12.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».