MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2325717833 · doi:10.1097/dbp.0000000000000044

Parenting and Substance Abuse

2014· article· en· W2325717833 sur OpenAlexaff
Fabian Gorodzinsky

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAddictionPsychologySubstance abuseImpulsivityIntervention (counseling)Developmental psychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This is the first edition of a book on a topic that is seldom analyzed in detail, yet of utmost importance given its prevalence in our society. This book is divided into 2 parts, the first focusing on understanding substance abuse and its implications for parenting, and the second part dealing with risk assessment and intervention. As per the authors, “Both addiction and parenthood are conditions and states of being that impact many others—family, friends, children and bring profound transformative changes in a person's life, sometimes for the worse in both instances.” We have long known that substance abuse is an addictive behavior, and that the stress of parenting can be a trigger for relapse or continuing use. The authors report studies that mothers with a history of cocaine use have less emotional engagement and responsiveness to their infants and toddlers. Furthermore, although genetics play an important role, the authors feel that environmental influences may be even stronger. Chapter 3 is devoted to an exploration of impulsivity as the main factor leading to substance abuse. “Substance abuse itself is often conceptualized as an impulsive behavior, according to Dewitt, 2008. Factors influencing impulsive behavior include the need to pursue opportunities for reward, negative effect, and lack of urge inhibition and cognitive resource depletion.” In the sixth chapter, the authors review the impact of the substance abuse on mother's ability to care for their infants. According to the authors, “The infants are often neglected and develop representations of the outside world as unavailable and unsoothing.” In chapter 10, the authors review evidence that, “older children who experience both prenatal or postnatal exposure to parental addiction are at risk for a range of emotional, academic, and developmental problems. This has been recorded on a number of different cognitive, social, and academic scales.” Mothers who abuse drugs during pregnancy often question themselves on their ability to be able to keep their babies properly nourished, to satisfy their emotional needs and learn to love and respect themselves enough to see themselves as adequate and loving mothers. The mainstay of intervention is an excellent collaboration with drug counselors. This is especially important in cases where there is neonatal drug withdrawal. Chapter 16 details the psychoanalytic Attachment-Oriented Group Intervention for Substance-Abusing Mothers and their Infants. This type of intervention has as its main goal to reduce the possibility of the mothers transmitting their traumatic past into negative interactions with their infants. This is provided in small group therapy sessions beginning in late pregnancy and lasting for 6 months. This technique allows the mother to regard the group therapy as her first attachment object, thereby enhancing her ability to attach with the baby when it's born. There is widespread acceptance of the definition of recovery. The Parent Child Assistance program was developed at the University of Washington, Seattle. Its prime goal is to help mothers obtain treatment, stay in recovery, and assure their children a stable home environment. The definition of recovery is the voluntarily maintained lifestyle with sobriety, personal health, and being an active member of society. In summary, Nancy E. Suchman, Marjukka Pajulo, and Linda C. Mayes have edited this collection of chapters from various authors. It offers a comprehensive review of multiple issues related to parenting and substance abuse.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,044
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,583

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Developmental & Behavioral PediatricsMême sujetChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207