MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325717833 · doi:10.1097/dbp.0000000000000044

Parenting and Substance Abuse

2014· article· en· W2325717833 on OpenAlexaff
Fabian Gorodzinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAddictionPsychologySubstance abuseImpulsivityIntervention (counseling)Developmental psychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the first edition of a book on a topic that is seldom analyzed in detail, yet of utmost importance given its prevalence in our society. This book is divided into 2 parts, the first focusing on understanding substance abuse and its implications for parenting, and the second part dealing with risk assessment and intervention. As per the authors, “Both addiction and parenthood are conditions and states of being that impact many others—family, friends, children and bring profound transformative changes in a person's life, sometimes for the worse in both instances.” We have long known that substance abuse is an addictive behavior, and that the stress of parenting can be a trigger for relapse or continuing use. The authors report studies that mothers with a history of cocaine use have less emotional engagement and responsiveness to their infants and toddlers. Furthermore, although genetics play an important role, the authors feel that environmental influences may be even stronger. Chapter 3 is devoted to an exploration of impulsivity as the main factor leading to substance abuse. “Substance abuse itself is often conceptualized as an impulsive behavior, according to Dewitt, 2008. Factors influencing impulsive behavior include the need to pursue opportunities for reward, negative effect, and lack of urge inhibition and cognitive resource depletion.” In the sixth chapter, the authors review the impact of the substance abuse on mother's ability to care for their infants. According to the authors, “The infants are often neglected and develop representations of the outside world as unavailable and unsoothing.” In chapter 10, the authors review evidence that, “older children who experience both prenatal or postnatal exposure to parental addiction are at risk for a range of emotional, academic, and developmental problems. This has been recorded on a number of different cognitive, social, and academic scales.” Mothers who abuse drugs during pregnancy often question themselves on their ability to be able to keep their babies properly nourished, to satisfy their emotional needs and learn to love and respect themselves enough to see themselves as adequate and loving mothers. The mainstay of intervention is an excellent collaboration with drug counselors. This is especially important in cases where there is neonatal drug withdrawal. Chapter 16 details the psychoanalytic Attachment-Oriented Group Intervention for Substance-Abusing Mothers and their Infants. This type of intervention has as its main goal to reduce the possibility of the mothers transmitting their traumatic past into negative interactions with their infants. This is provided in small group therapy sessions beginning in late pregnancy and lasting for 6 months. This technique allows the mother to regard the group therapy as her first attachment object, thereby enhancing her ability to attach with the baby when it's born. There is widespread acceptance of the definition of recovery. The Parent Child Assistance program was developed at the University of Washington, Seattle. Its prime goal is to help mothers obtain treatment, stay in recovery, and assure their children a stable home environment. The definition of recovery is the voluntarily maintained lifestyle with sobriety, personal health, and being an active member of society. In summary, Nancy E. Suchman, Marjukka Pajulo, and Linda C. Mayes have edited this collection of chapters from various authors. It offers a comprehensive review of multiple issues related to parenting and substance abuse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Developmental & Behavioral PediatricsSame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207