MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2325814771 · doi:10.1097/01.hj.0000287403.47008.10

A great convention, but nothing's perfect

2007· article· en· W2325814771 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David H. Kirkwood

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Hearing Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDiverse Musicological Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEnthusiasmPrideConventionLawNothingTheme (computing)Political scienceSociologyPsychologyPhilosophyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Figure. David: H. KirkwoodAudiologyNOW! 2007, the American Academy of Audiology's 19th Annual Convention, was about as good as professional meetings get. It was filled with opportunities for audiologists to learn, interact with one another, and renew their enthusiasm and pride in what they do. There were many great things about the meeting, which you can read about further on in this issue. Certainly one highlight was the terrific turnout—more than 7000 people, including the largest gathering of audiologists ever. The academy deserves special credit for expanding the community service component of the convention. Some of the brightest moments occurred during the General Assembly, including Marion Downs's delightful welcoming remarks and the inspired rap, Turn it to the Left. The talks by the president, Paul Pessis, AuD, and president-elect, Alison Grimes, AuD, showed that academy's leadership is in good hands. Especially welcome was Dr. Grimes's call for action in response to the critical shortage of audiologists. A SOUR NOTE In the midst of all that was positive in Denver, there was one sour note, at least in my opinion. In her otherwise excellent speech, Dr. Grimes referred approvingly to the academy's effort to have state licensing boards and attorneys general ban the use of the term “audioprosthologist,” which she described as “mean- ingless” and “suspiciously similar” to “audiologist.” She predicted, “This audioprosthologist bear [a reference to the recurring bear theme at AudiologyNOW!] will hibernate forever.” Her prediction made for a good applause line, and it may even come true, though I doubt it. But whether the effort succeeds or fails, it is not a just cause nor one worthy of audiology or the academy. Apparently AAA views audioprosthologist as a term made up by hearing instrument specialists to fool unwary consumers into thinking they are audiologists. However, the facts show otherwise. Far from “meaningless,” the term has a clear and well-established meaning. The audiologist James Delk, in the 1983 edition of his landmark dictionary of audiology, defined it as “a hearing aid fitting specialist,” specifically one who has completed the course given by the American Conference of Audioprosthology (ACA). In 1997, when Brad Stach, PhD, a founder and former president of AAA, compiled his excellent Comprehensive Dictionary of Audiology for The Hearing Journal, he defined an audioprosthologist as “a person credentialed in the fitting and dispensing of hearing aids.” Harold Williams, EdD, originally a speech-language pathologist, and Bob Briskey, MA, an audiologist, founded ACA in 1976 with the laudable goal of offering continuing education to hearing aid dispensers. Those who completed the program earned the designation of audioprosthologist, a term derived from Latin and Greek for one trained in the science of fitting prostheses for hearing. Hearing aid dispensers in France and Quebec go by a similar term, “audioprothésistes.” ACA's intent from the start has been to improve dispenser training, not to deceive the public, and I've heard no evidence of consumers mistaking audioprosthologists for audiologists—or vice versa. Today, ACA operates under the aegis of the International Hearing Society, and is supervised by a committee chaired by Patricia Connelly, PhD, director of audiology at University Hospital in Newark, NJ. To earn the ACA credential dispensers must attend classes 2 days a month over 13 months and pass courses in such subjects as physiology of the auditory system, acoustics, and business practices. State licensure laws need to be revised to recognize audiology as a doctoral profession. However, audiologists should not use this a pretext to chip away at the rights of other licensed professionals. Indeed, given all that audiology has going for it, I do not understand why some still want to waste resources on turf battles. Today's new doctors of audiology enter the field better trained and equipped than any before them to meet the public's hearing and balance needs. What's more, those needs are growing at an unprecedented pace. Surely, if audiologists work hard and are dedicated to their patients' well being, they will achieve the success they deserve, even if they must co-exist with the “audioprosthologist bear.”

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,942
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,161
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,099 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Hearing JournalMême sujetDiverse Musicological StudiesTravaux en français237 207