MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A great convention, but nothing's perfect

2007· article· en· W2325814771 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David H. Kirkwood

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Hearing Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Musicological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmPrideConventionLawNothingTheme (computing)Political scienceSociologyPsychologyPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Figure. David: H. KirkwoodAudiologyNOW! 2007, the American Academy of Audiology's 19th Annual Convention, was about as good as professional meetings get. It was filled with opportunities for audiologists to learn, interact with one another, and renew their enthusiasm and pride in what they do. There were many great things about the meeting, which you can read about further on in this issue. Certainly one highlight was the terrific turnout—more than 7000 people, including the largest gathering of audiologists ever. The academy deserves special credit for expanding the community service component of the convention. Some of the brightest moments occurred during the General Assembly, including Marion Downs's delightful welcoming remarks and the inspired rap, Turn it to the Left. The talks by the president, Paul Pessis, AuD, and president-elect, Alison Grimes, AuD, showed that academy's leadership is in good hands. Especially welcome was Dr. Grimes's call for action in response to the critical shortage of audiologists. A SOUR NOTE In the midst of all that was positive in Denver, there was one sour note, at least in my opinion. In her otherwise excellent speech, Dr. Grimes referred approvingly to the academy's effort to have state licensing boards and attorneys general ban the use of the term “audioprosthologist,” which she described as “mean- ingless” and “suspiciously similar” to “audiologist.” She predicted, “This audioprosthologist bear [a reference to the recurring bear theme at AudiologyNOW!] will hibernate forever.” Her prediction made for a good applause line, and it may even come true, though I doubt it. But whether the effort succeeds or fails, it is not a just cause nor one worthy of audiology or the academy. Apparently AAA views audioprosthologist as a term made up by hearing instrument specialists to fool unwary consumers into thinking they are audiologists. However, the facts show otherwise. Far from “meaningless,” the term has a clear and well-established meaning. The audiologist James Delk, in the 1983 edition of his landmark dictionary of audiology, defined it as “a hearing aid fitting specialist,” specifically one who has completed the course given by the American Conference of Audioprosthology (ACA). In 1997, when Brad Stach, PhD, a founder and former president of AAA, compiled his excellent Comprehensive Dictionary of Audiology for The Hearing Journal, he defined an audioprosthologist as “a person credentialed in the fitting and dispensing of hearing aids.” Harold Williams, EdD, originally a speech-language pathologist, and Bob Briskey, MA, an audiologist, founded ACA in 1976 with the laudable goal of offering continuing education to hearing aid dispensers. Those who completed the program earned the designation of audioprosthologist, a term derived from Latin and Greek for one trained in the science of fitting prostheses for hearing. Hearing aid dispensers in France and Quebec go by a similar term, “audioprothésistes.” ACA's intent from the start has been to improve dispenser training, not to deceive the public, and I've heard no evidence of consumers mistaking audioprosthologists for audiologists—or vice versa. Today, ACA operates under the aegis of the International Hearing Society, and is supervised by a committee chaired by Patricia Connelly, PhD, director of audiology at University Hospital in Newark, NJ. To earn the ACA credential dispensers must attend classes 2 days a month over 13 months and pass courses in such subjects as physiology of the auditory system, acoustics, and business practices. State licensure laws need to be revised to recognize audiology as a doctoral profession. However, audiologists should not use this a pretext to chip away at the rights of other licensed professionals. Indeed, given all that audiology has going for it, I do not understand why some still want to waste resources on turf battles. Today's new doctors of audiology enter the field better trained and equipped than any before them to meet the public's hearing and balance needs. What's more, those needs are growing at an unprecedented pace. Surely, if audiologists work hard and are dedicated to their patients' well being, they will achieve the success they deserve, even if they must co-exist with the “audioprosthologist bear.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0140.013
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0050.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1390.074

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.099 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Hearing JournalSame topicDiverse Musicological StudiesFrench-language works237,207