No increase in HIV incidence observed in a cohort of men who have sex with other men in Montreal
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To monitor HIV incidence we tested a cohort of men who have sex with men in Montreal for HIV every 6 months. Between 1996 and 2001, 17 out of 1244 participants seroconverted, for an HIV incidence of 0.56 per 100 person-years (py) (95% CL 0.29, 0.83). The incidence decreased over the study period, from 0.75 to 0.34 per 100 py; which was not statistically significant. An in-depth evaluation of the situation in Montreal could identify useful lessons for prevention efforts elsewhere. Men who have sex with men (MSM) have been severely affected by the HIV epidemic and, in industrialized countries, make up the majority of HIV-infected individuals. The incidence of HIV among MSM was generally highest early in the epidemic and, as a result of marked reductions in risky sexual behaviours, has decreased since then. HIV prevalence in this group is generally 10–20% [1,2]. Beginning in 1996, new combination highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens markedly improved the prognosis of HIV infection, resulting in plummeting rates of AIDS and death. Subsequently, however, studies in north America, Europe and Australia have observed a recrudescence in the incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases (STD) [3,4], high risk sexual behaviours [5,6] and in some jurisdictions the incidence of HIV [7,8]. One US study [9] reported that high-risk behaviours were associated with a reduced concern about becoming infected as a result of HAART. In October 1996, we began recruiting HIV-seronegative MSM in Montreal to measure the incidence of HIV and its behavioural determinants. We obtained informed consent and, at baseline and 6 month follow-up visits, tested participants for HIV and collected data on sexual behaviours. Up to February 2001, 1588 MSM enrolled in the study. The drop-out rate was 14% at the second visit, decreasing to 8% for subsequent visits. A total of 1244 participants attended for one to eight follow-up visits, contributing 3027 person-years (py) of observation. We observed 17 seroconversions for an HIV incidence of 0.56 per 100 py (95% confidence limits 0.29, 0.83). Incidence decreased over the study period, from 0.75 per 100 py in 1996–1997 to 0.34 per 100 py in 2000–2001. This decreasing trend was not, however, statistically significant. The incidence of HIV overall was 0.96 per 100 py in MSM less than 30 years old compared with 0.38 per 100 py in those aged 30 years or older. However, the incidence of HIV was actually greater in older MSM in the first 15 months of the study but has been lower since then (see Fig. 1).Fig. 1.: HIV incidence by calendar year and age (Omega Cohort Study, Monteal, 1997–2000). ––▪–– Less than 30 years; ––⋄–– 30 years or older; ––▴–– all ages.We examined the incidence of HIV as a function of calendar time and the number of visits in the study to determine whether the decreasing trend in HIV incidence may be the result of a ‘cohort effect'. Incidence among those in the study for longer may be lower because of such factors as repeated counselling and a selective drop-out of higher-risk MSM. This analysis indicated no obvious cohort effect. Although we observed a decreasing trend in HIV incidence in a cohort of MSM in Montreal, it is too early to conclude that the incidence of HIV is really decreasing. Nevertheless, it is clear that the incidence of HIV is not increasing. Our study monitored sexual behaviour, and we observed a modest increase in the proportion of men reporting risky behaviour. Unprotected anal sex with a casual partner between April 1997 and September 1998 was reported by 8.7% of participants, between October 1998 and September 1999 it was reported by 10.1%, and from October 1999 to September 2000, by 9.8%. The proportion reporting unprotected anal sex with any partner other than an HIV-negative regular partner also increased slightly: April 1997 to September 1998, 16.0%; October 1998 to September 1999, 16.1%; and October 1999 to September 2000, 18.1%. None of these increases, however, were statistically significant [10]. STD may be a useful indicator of sexual behaviours that place MSM at risk of HIV infection. The reported rectal gonorrhoea cases among men in Montreal increased 39% during the course of our study, from 19 in 1996 to 26.5 in 1997–2000 (R. Parent, personal communication, 2001). Montreal also experienced a marked increase in reported cases of infectious syphilis in the period September 2000 to July 2001, mostly among homosexual men [11]. During this 10 month period, 16 cases (13 MSM) were reported compared with the usual one to three cases. Participants in our study had reported an STD diagnosis in the previous 6 months as follows: gonorrhoea 1.5%, chlamydia 1.1%, syphilis 0.1%, herpes 0.8%, and genital warts 2.0%. An increasing trend was observed for gonorrhoea (1.6% in 1998–2001 versus 0.8% in 1997) and chlamydia (1.4% in 1999–2001 versus 0.5% in 1997–1998). The 1.9-fold increase for gonorrhoea was not statistically significant. The 2.7-fold increase in chlamydia (P < 0.01) coincided with the introduction of the ligase chain reaction assay, a more sensitive test than those used previously. We also tested participants for syphilis at each visit; to date, we have observed one confirmed and one possible new syphilis infection. The data on sexual behaviour and STD among MSM in Montreal suggest a potential for increased HIV spread in this population. Nevertheless, bacterial STD and HIV incidence do not necessarily vary concordantly, partly as a result of public health measures undertaken to interrupt the transmission of bacterial STD, and because the subpopulations affected may not be the same. Our observation of stable or decreasing HIV incidence contrasts with other major urban centres in Canada. A study among individuals testing at least twice [12] observed that the incidence of HIV among MSM in Toronto, a city of comparable size and HIV epidemiology to Montreal, increased 78% from 1996 to 1999. A cohort of MSM under 30 years of age in Vancouver [8] observed a threefold increase in the incidence of HIV in 1999–2000 compared eith 1995–1999. Our study results do not indicate why Montreal appears to be spared from the increased HIV incidence observed elsewhere. Recently, we added questions about HAART and post-exposure prophylaxis to obtain a better understanding of these factors and to compare our situation with that elsewhere [13]. In Canada, the HIV epidemic among MSM has been historically comparable in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. However, Montreal is the only major urban centre in Canada with an organization dedicated solely to HIV prevention among MSM. Action Séro-Zéro distributes condoms in bars and bathhouses, provides small group workshops on self-esteem and affirmation, ageing, social networking and sexuality, and targets interventions to young gay men, male prostitutes and ethnocultural minorities. These interventions are regularly evaluated. Prevention activities have been intensified and diversified since 1996, when HAART arrived. This was apparently not the case in cities such as New York [14] and Paris [15], and in the rest of Canada. Montreal may thus have more sustained, co-ordinated HIV prevention programmes among MSM than other Canadian cities. Finally, most MSM in Montreal are French-speaking, and may be somewhat isolated from discussions on such subjects as ‘barebacking'. An in-depth comparison of the situation in Montreal with that in other cities could help to identify useful lessons for prevention efforts elsewhere. Robert S. Remisa,b Michel Alaryc,d Joanne Otise Benoit Mâssec Eric Demersc Jean Vincelettef Bruno Turmelb Roger LeClercg René Lavoieh Raymond Parentd Clemon Georgec and the Omega Study Group
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».