MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

No increase in HIV incidence observed in a cohort of men who have sex with other men in Montreal

2002· article· en· W2327345510 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert S. Remis, Michel Alary, Joanne Otis, Benoı̂t Mâsse, Éric Demers, Jean Vincelette, Bruno Turmel, Roger LeClerc, René Lavoie, R Parent, Clemon George

Bibliographic record

VenueAIDS · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsSante MontrealSiemens (Canada)Université du Québec à MontréalInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecHôpital Saint-LucHôpital du Saint-SacrementCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)CohortMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Men who have sex with menDemographyCohort studyInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To monitor HIV incidence we tested a cohort of men who have sex with men in Montreal for HIV every 6 months. Between 1996 and 2001, 17 out of 1244 participants seroconverted, for an HIV incidence of 0.56 per 100 person-years (py) (95% CL 0.29, 0.83). The incidence decreased over the study period, from 0.75 to 0.34 per 100 py; which was not statistically significant. An in-depth evaluation of the situation in Montreal could identify useful lessons for prevention efforts elsewhere. Men who have sex with men (MSM) have been severely affected by the HIV epidemic and, in industrialized countries, make up the majority of HIV-infected individuals. The incidence of HIV among MSM was generally highest early in the epidemic and, as a result of marked reductions in risky sexual behaviours, has decreased since then. HIV prevalence in this group is generally 10–20% [1,2]. Beginning in 1996, new combination highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens markedly improved the prognosis of HIV infection, resulting in plummeting rates of AIDS and death. Subsequently, however, studies in north America, Europe and Australia have observed a recrudescence in the incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases (STD) [3,4], high risk sexual behaviours [5,6] and in some jurisdictions the incidence of HIV [7,8]. One US study [9] reported that high-risk behaviours were associated with a reduced concern about becoming infected as a result of HAART. In October 1996, we began recruiting HIV-seronegative MSM in Montreal to measure the incidence of HIV and its behavioural determinants. We obtained informed consent and, at baseline and 6 month follow-up visits, tested participants for HIV and collected data on sexual behaviours. Up to February 2001, 1588 MSM enrolled in the study. The drop-out rate was 14% at the second visit, decreasing to 8% for subsequent visits. A total of 1244 participants attended for one to eight follow-up visits, contributing 3027 person-years (py) of observation. We observed 17 seroconversions for an HIV incidence of 0.56 per 100 py (95% confidence limits 0.29, 0.83). Incidence decreased over the study period, from 0.75 per 100 py in 1996–1997 to 0.34 per 100 py in 2000–2001. This decreasing trend was not, however, statistically significant. The incidence of HIV overall was 0.96 per 100 py in MSM less than 30 years old compared with 0.38 per 100 py in those aged 30 years or older. However, the incidence of HIV was actually greater in older MSM in the first 15 months of the study but has been lower since then (see Fig. 1).Fig. 1.: HIV incidence by calendar year and age (Omega Cohort Study, Monteal, 1997–2000). ––▪–– Less than 30 years; ––⋄–– 30 years or older; ––▴–– all ages.We examined the incidence of HIV as a function of calendar time and the number of visits in the study to determine whether the decreasing trend in HIV incidence may be the result of a ‘cohort effect'. Incidence among those in the study for longer may be lower because of such factors as repeated counselling and a selective drop-out of higher-risk MSM. This analysis indicated no obvious cohort effect. Although we observed a decreasing trend in HIV incidence in a cohort of MSM in Montreal, it is too early to conclude that the incidence of HIV is really decreasing. Nevertheless, it is clear that the incidence of HIV is not increasing. Our study monitored sexual behaviour, and we observed a modest increase in the proportion of men reporting risky behaviour. Unprotected anal sex with a casual partner between April 1997 and September 1998 was reported by 8.7% of participants, between October 1998 and September 1999 it was reported by 10.1%, and from October 1999 to September 2000, by 9.8%. The proportion reporting unprotected anal sex with any partner other than an HIV-negative regular partner also increased slightly: April 1997 to September 1998, 16.0%; October 1998 to September 1999, 16.1%; and October 1999 to September 2000, 18.1%. None of these increases, however, were statistically significant [10]. STD may be a useful indicator of sexual behaviours that place MSM at risk of HIV infection. The reported rectal gonorrhoea cases among men in Montreal increased 39% during the course of our study, from 19 in 1996 to 26.5 in 1997–2000 (R. Parent, personal communication, 2001). Montreal also experienced a marked increase in reported cases of infectious syphilis in the period September 2000 to July 2001, mostly among homosexual men [11]. During this 10 month period, 16 cases (13 MSM) were reported compared with the usual one to three cases. Participants in our study had reported an STD diagnosis in the previous 6 months as follows: gonorrhoea 1.5%, chlamydia 1.1%, syphilis 0.1%, herpes 0.8%, and genital warts 2.0%. An increasing trend was observed for gonorrhoea (1.6% in 1998–2001 versus 0.8% in 1997) and chlamydia (1.4% in 1999–2001 versus 0.5% in 1997–1998). The 1.9-fold increase for gonorrhoea was not statistically significant. The 2.7-fold increase in chlamydia (P < 0.01) coincided with the introduction of the ligase chain reaction assay, a more sensitive test than those used previously. We also tested participants for syphilis at each visit; to date, we have observed one confirmed and one possible new syphilis infection. The data on sexual behaviour and STD among MSM in Montreal suggest a potential for increased HIV spread in this population. Nevertheless, bacterial STD and HIV incidence do not necessarily vary concordantly, partly as a result of public health measures undertaken to interrupt the transmission of bacterial STD, and because the subpopulations affected may not be the same. Our observation of stable or decreasing HIV incidence contrasts with other major urban centres in Canada. A study among individuals testing at least twice [12] observed that the incidence of HIV among MSM in Toronto, a city of comparable size and HIV epidemiology to Montreal, increased 78% from 1996 to 1999. A cohort of MSM under 30 years of age in Vancouver [8] observed a threefold increase in the incidence of HIV in 1999–2000 compared eith 1995–1999. Our study results do not indicate why Montreal appears to be spared from the increased HIV incidence observed elsewhere. Recently, we added questions about HAART and post-exposure prophylaxis to obtain a better understanding of these factors and to compare our situation with that elsewhere [13]. In Canada, the HIV epidemic among MSM has been historically comparable in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. However, Montreal is the only major urban centre in Canada with an organization dedicated solely to HIV prevention among MSM. Action Séro-Zéro distributes condoms in bars and bathhouses, provides small group workshops on self-esteem and affirmation, ageing, social networking and sexuality, and targets interventions to young gay men, male prostitutes and ethnocultural minorities. These interventions are regularly evaluated. Prevention activities have been intensified and diversified since 1996, when HAART arrived. This was apparently not the case in cities such as New York [14] and Paris [15], and in the rest of Canada. Montreal may thus have more sustained, co-ordinated HIV prevention programmes among MSM than other Canadian cities. Finally, most MSM in Montreal are French-speaking, and may be somewhat isolated from discussions on such subjects as ‘barebacking'. An in-depth comparison of the situation in Montreal with that in other cities could help to identify useful lessons for prevention efforts elsewhere. Robert S. Remisa,b Michel Alaryc,d Joanne Otise Benoit Mâssec Eric Demersc Jean Vincelettef Bruno Turmelb Roger LeClercg René Lavoieh Raymond Parentd Clemon Georgec and the Omega Study Group

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIDSSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207