MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2328329075 · doi:10.1177/1077699015569232p

Book Review: <i>Making National News: A History of the Canadian Press</i> , by Gene Allen

2015· article· en· W2328329075 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julia Duin

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAgency (philosophy)PopulationMedia studiesNews mediaPoliticsHistoryPolitical scienceSociologyLawDemographySocial science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Making National News: A History of the Canadian Press. Gene Allen. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2013. 472 pp. $80 hbk. $36.95 pbk. $25.95 ebk.To the north of America lies a country of thirty million whose news history is quite different from its southern neighbor. Canadian Press (CP), the national news agency of Canada, had to cope with problems that the American wire services such as the Associated Press ( AP) and United Press International (UPI) never had to deal with. For much of its history, Canada was an officially bilingual country spread out over vast distances with population centers on its eastern and western coasts but vast empty spaces in between. In the nineteenth century, midwestern cities such as Calgary and Winnipeg did not have the populations of similar cities to the south. Just how Canada managed to develop its own news agency is the topic of this book. The author is a professor at Ryerson University (in Toronto), who noted in his introduction that a thorough history of Canada's wire service had never been written. He needed six research assistants just to go through Canadian Press' archives, so there was no lack of material.Canadians were dependent on New York for their news because a substantial amount of British and European news was telegraphed from ships arriving from overseas in that city. The first trans-Atlantic cable in 1866 helped bring day-old news to Canada, which meant readers no longer had to wait weeks for it. News was transmitted through Canada via the telegraph department of the Canadian Pacific Railway, the only institution that stretched from Newfoundland to British Columbia. The problem was it cost more to transmit news to western Canada, and there were fewer newspapers in the western provinces to share the cost.Unlike Americans, Canadians were much more interested in British news. And the provinces were less unified than the American states-to the point that the owners of the Associated Press had to lecture the Canadians in 1914 about creating a national wire service. Serious talks about such an entity began around 1910. But it was not until September 2, 1917, that Canadian Press Ltd. was created with the help of a yearly government subsidy of $50,000. Why? The Canadian government wanted substantial coverage of the war effort overseas to help recruit soldiers and maintain enthusiasm for the morass that World War I was becoming. It also wanted a news source independent from those in the United States.The subsidy was short-lived. It was withdrawn in 1923 after the wire service covered news considered unfavorable to government interests. The end of the subsidy helped Canadian Press become less partisan, essentially following a trail toward greater objectivity and professionalism. CP depended on the services of Morse telegraphers, which is how news was transmitted at the beginning of the twentieth century. Then in the 1920s, a new printer technology was introduced that allowed newspapers to get telegraphic dispatches sent to their office printers without the intermediary of a Morse operator.Starting in 1933, CP got into radio news. It also expanded into television broadcasting, for no other reason than American-based stations were expanding into Canadian territory. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,537
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournalism & Mass Communication QuarterlyMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207