MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328329075 · doi:10.1177/1077699015569232p

Book Review: <i>Making National News: A History of the Canadian Press</i> , by Gene Allen

2015· article· en· W2328329075 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julia Duin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)PopulationMedia studiesNews mediaPoliticsHistoryPolitical scienceSociologyLawDemographySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Making National News: A History of the Canadian Press. Gene Allen. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2013. 472 pp. $80 hbk. $36.95 pbk. $25.95 ebk.To the north of America lies a country of thirty million whose news history is quite different from its southern neighbor. Canadian Press (CP), the national news agency of Canada, had to cope with problems that the American wire services such as the Associated Press ( AP) and United Press International (UPI) never had to deal with. For much of its history, Canada was an officially bilingual country spread out over vast distances with population centers on its eastern and western coasts but vast empty spaces in between. In the nineteenth century, midwestern cities such as Calgary and Winnipeg did not have the populations of similar cities to the south. Just how Canada managed to develop its own news agency is the topic of this book. The author is a professor at Ryerson University (in Toronto), who noted in his introduction that a thorough history of Canada's wire service had never been written. He needed six research assistants just to go through Canadian Press' archives, so there was no lack of material.Canadians were dependent on New York for their news because a substantial amount of British and European news was telegraphed from ships arriving from overseas in that city. The first trans-Atlantic cable in 1866 helped bring day-old news to Canada, which meant readers no longer had to wait weeks for it. News was transmitted through Canada via the telegraph department of the Canadian Pacific Railway, the only institution that stretched from Newfoundland to British Columbia. The problem was it cost more to transmit news to western Canada, and there were fewer newspapers in the western provinces to share the cost.Unlike Americans, Canadians were much more interested in British news. And the provinces were less unified than the American states-to the point that the owners of the Associated Press had to lecture the Canadians in 1914 about creating a national wire service. Serious talks about such an entity began around 1910. But it was not until September 2, 1917, that Canadian Press Ltd. was created with the help of a yearly government subsidy of $50,000. Why? The Canadian government wanted substantial coverage of the war effort overseas to help recruit soldiers and maintain enthusiasm for the morass that World War I was becoming. It also wanted a news source independent from those in the United States.The subsidy was short-lived. It was withdrawn in 1923 after the wire service covered news considered unfavorable to government interests. The end of the subsidy helped Canadian Press become less partisan, essentially following a trail toward greater objectivity and professionalism. CP depended on the services of Morse telegraphers, which is how news was transmitted at the beginning of the twentieth century. Then in the 1920s, a new printer technology was introduced that allowed newspapers to get telegraphic dispatches sent to their office printers without the intermediary of a Morse operator.Starting in 1933, CP got into radio news. It also expanded into television broadcasting, for no other reason than American-based stations were expanding into Canadian territory. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.016
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0900.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournalism & Mass Communication QuarterlySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207