MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2328381742 · doi:10.1242/jeb.064386

REDUCED GROWTH IN FIXED FISH

2012· article· en· W2328381742 sur OpenAlexaff
Sarah L. Alderman

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueFish biology, ecology, and behavior
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologySexual maturityOreochromis mossambicusEndocrinologyInternal medicineReproductionHormoneTilapiaGonadEndocrine systemHatchingSexual differentiationGrowth hormoneTestosterone (patch)Fish <Actinopterygii>Development of the gonadsGeneEcologyFisheryGeneticsMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Growth and reproduction are intimately linked by the endocrine system. Pituitary growth hormone (GH) is a major driver of body growth, and modulation of its expression and secretion can be influenced by sex hormones. Despite the established relationship between growth and reproduction, however, the precise role of the gonads in regulating body growth has not been adequately studied, particularly in species displaying sexual growth differences.Takeshi Miura and his team from Ehime University in Japan began their study with a simple question – what role do the gonads play in body growth? To answer this question, they removed the gonads from Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) 40 days after hatching – when the immature fish can be readily sexed by eye. Then, some fish received their gonads back, although the scientists relocated the gonads between the skin and muscle, and all the fish were weighed 50 days later (at sexual maturity) to determine whether there were any differences in their body masses. Miura and colleagues also measured plasma concentrations of key sex hormones – including 11-ketotestosterone, which is usually produced by the testes and estradiol, which is usually produced by the ovaries – as well as plasma growth hormone and gene expression levels of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1.The researchers found that fish of both sexes without gonads had significantly reduced body mass compared with fish that had not had their gonads removed. In addition, the fish that had regained their gonads after they were initially removed fully recovered their mass. However, when the team looked at the fish's sex hormone levels (11-ketotestosterone and estradiol) there was no correlation between sex hormone level and body size, with males and females showing different hormone patterns. Therefore, as the growth patterns of the two sexes responded identically to the loss and return of their gonads, the changes between the sexes indicate that sex hormones alone cannot explain the influence of gonads on growth.The authors then looked to growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 to explain how gonads directly influence growth. While there were no differences between treatments in the transcript levels of these genes in the pituitary, gonads or liver, levels of growth hormone in the plasma were significantly reduced in male and female tilapia that had lost their gonads. However, the males and females that had received their gonads back fully recovered their plasma growth hormone levels, suggesting that growth hormone produced by the gonads is secreted into the blood to help regulate body growth. This finding is particularly important as it calls into question the long-held assumption that all circulating growth hormone originates from the pituitary. While many other tissues express growth hormone, the conventional thought is that it acts locally and is not secreted into the blood. Miura's study suggests that the gonads are also significant sources of circulating growth hormone, at least in teleosts.Using a conceptually simple technique, Miura's team clearly show that fish gonads are necessary for normal growth in teleosts, and that growth hormone – not sex steroids – is the major factor governing this relationship. Another important finding is that the pituitary may not be the sole source of circulating growth hormone in non-mammalian vertebrates, opening new avenues of research into the functions of growth hormone from tissues other than the pituitary.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,041

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,296
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Experimental BiologyMême sujetFish biology, ecology, and behaviorTravaux en français237 207