MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328381742 · doi:10.1242/jeb.064386

REDUCED GROWTH IN FIXED FISH

2012· article· en· W2328381742 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah L. Alderman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish biology, ecology, and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySexual maturityOreochromis mossambicusEndocrinologyInternal medicineReproductionHormoneTilapiaGonadEndocrine systemHatchingSexual differentiationGrowth hormoneTestosterone (patch)Fish <Actinopterygii>Development of the gonadsGeneEcologyFisheryGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growth and reproduction are intimately linked by the endocrine system. Pituitary growth hormone (GH) is a major driver of body growth, and modulation of its expression and secretion can be influenced by sex hormones. Despite the established relationship between growth and reproduction, however, the precise role of the gonads in regulating body growth has not been adequately studied, particularly in species displaying sexual growth differences.Takeshi Miura and his team from Ehime University in Japan began their study with a simple question – what role do the gonads play in body growth? To answer this question, they removed the gonads from Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) 40 days after hatching – when the immature fish can be readily sexed by eye. Then, some fish received their gonads back, although the scientists relocated the gonads between the skin and muscle, and all the fish were weighed 50 days later (at sexual maturity) to determine whether there were any differences in their body masses. Miura and colleagues also measured plasma concentrations of key sex hormones – including 11-ketotestosterone, which is usually produced by the testes and estradiol, which is usually produced by the ovaries – as well as plasma growth hormone and gene expression levels of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1.The researchers found that fish of both sexes without gonads had significantly reduced body mass compared with fish that had not had their gonads removed. In addition, the fish that had regained their gonads after they were initially removed fully recovered their mass. However, when the team looked at the fish's sex hormone levels (11-ketotestosterone and estradiol) there was no correlation between sex hormone level and body size, with males and females showing different hormone patterns. Therefore, as the growth patterns of the two sexes responded identically to the loss and return of their gonads, the changes between the sexes indicate that sex hormones alone cannot explain the influence of gonads on growth.The authors then looked to growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 to explain how gonads directly influence growth. While there were no differences between treatments in the transcript levels of these genes in the pituitary, gonads or liver, levels of growth hormone in the plasma were significantly reduced in male and female tilapia that had lost their gonads. However, the males and females that had received their gonads back fully recovered their plasma growth hormone levels, suggesting that growth hormone produced by the gonads is secreted into the blood to help regulate body growth. This finding is particularly important as it calls into question the long-held assumption that all circulating growth hormone originates from the pituitary. While many other tissues express growth hormone, the conventional thought is that it acts locally and is not secreted into the blood. Miura's study suggests that the gonads are also significant sources of circulating growth hormone, at least in teleosts.Using a conceptually simple technique, Miura's team clearly show that fish gonads are necessary for normal growth in teleosts, and that growth hormone – not sex steroids – is the major factor governing this relationship. Another important finding is that the pituitary may not be the sole source of circulating growth hormone in non-mammalian vertebrates, opening new avenues of research into the functions of growth hormone from tissues other than the pituitary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BiologySame topicFish biology, ecology, and behaviorFrench-language works237,207