Abstract 1591: Capsaicin enhances the effect of radiation in prostate cancer through NFκB suppression.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction and Objective: Radio-sensitizing agents sensitize cells to the lethal effects of ionizing radiation (IR). This permits use of lower doses of radiation to achieve equivalent cancer control thereby minimizing adverse effects to normal tissues. Given their lack of toxicity compounds occurring naturally in the diet make ideal potential radio-sensitizing agents. Capsaicin is the active compound chilli peppers. Traditionally capsaicin is used to treat chronic pain syndromes; however, recently evidence using in vitro prostate cancer (PCa) models describes its anti-carcinogenic potential. In our studies we have demonstrated that capsaicin can enhance the effect of radiation of prostate cancer in vitro and in vivo. The objective of the present study is to assess the how capsaicin enhances the effect of radiation in vitro an in vivo models. Methods: Using clonogenic assays we assessed the effect of ionizing radiation (1-8 Gy) and/or capsaicin (1-10μM) on colony formation rates in 4 human PCa cell lines (LNCaP, PC3, PC3AR2, DU145). Western Blot and immunocytochemical analysis was performed to examine mechanistic changes. Athymic nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with human PCa (LNCaP) cells. Once xenografts reach 100mm3 forty animals will be randomized into 4 groups (15 /group); control (no treatment), capsaicin alone, ionizing radiation (IR) alone and capsaicin and IR. Treatments were administered over a two-week time period. Capsaicin (5 mg/kg/d) or vehicle was administered 3/week by gavage. RT will be delivered to animals in sterile cages as one fraction (6 Gray). Tumours were measured thrice weekly and volumes were calculated. Tumours were fixed and stained for pathological analyses and immunohistochemical evaluation. Results: Exposure of cells to capsaicin (1-10μM) or IR (1-8Gy) caused significant dose-dependent inhibition of colony formation (p<0.001). Combining capsaicin with IR resulted in further significant inhibition of colony formation rates (P<0.001). Western Blot and IHC analysis showed that LNCaP cells treated with capsaicin and/or IR suppressed AR and NFκB, and increase DNA damage. Mice treated with capsaicin or IR alone had a significant reduction in tumour growth overtime (p < 0.001). Mice treated with capsaicin and IR capsaicin had a reduction in the tumour volume greater than either capsaicin alone (p<0.001) or radiation alone (p<0.03). Two mice experienced mild to moderate inflammation of the stomach. No other toxicities were observed. Mechanistic studies revealed that mice administered capsaicin and radiation had an increased yH2AX expression, and significantly lower Ki67 index, AR, and NFκB expression. Conclusion: These studies suggest that capsaicin enhances the effect of radiation through a number of mechanisms including the suppression of NFκB and AR. Citation Format: Natalie A. Venier, Alexandra J. Colquhoun, Laurence Klotz, Neil Fleshner, Vasundara Venkateswaran. Capsaicin enhances the effect of radiation in prostate cancer through NFκB suppression. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1591. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-1591
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».