MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328459544 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-1591

Abstract 1591: Capsaicin enhances the effect of radiation in prostate cancer through NFκB suppression.

2013· article· en· W2328459544 on OpenAlexaff
Natalie A. Venier, Alexandra Colquhoun, Laurence Klotz, Neil Fleshner, Vasundara Venkateswaran

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicIon Channels and Receptors
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLNCaPDU145CapsaicinIn vivoClonogenic assayProstate cancerMedicinePharmacologyIonizing radiationCancerIn vitroCancer researchChemistryInternal medicineBiologyReceptorIrradiationBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction and Objective: Radio-sensitizing agents sensitize cells to the lethal effects of ionizing radiation (IR). This permits use of lower doses of radiation to achieve equivalent cancer control thereby minimizing adverse effects to normal tissues. Given their lack of toxicity compounds occurring naturally in the diet make ideal potential radio-sensitizing agents. Capsaicin is the active compound chilli peppers. Traditionally capsaicin is used to treat chronic pain syndromes; however, recently evidence using in vitro prostate cancer (PCa) models describes its anti-carcinogenic potential. In our studies we have demonstrated that capsaicin can enhance the effect of radiation of prostate cancer in vitro and in vivo. The objective of the present study is to assess the how capsaicin enhances the effect of radiation in vitro an in vivo models. Methods: Using clonogenic assays we assessed the effect of ionizing radiation (1-8 Gy) and/or capsaicin (1-10μM) on colony formation rates in 4 human PCa cell lines (LNCaP, PC3, PC3AR2, DU145). Western Blot and immunocytochemical analysis was performed to examine mechanistic changes. Athymic nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with human PCa (LNCaP) cells. Once xenografts reach 100mm3 forty animals will be randomized into 4 groups (15 /group); control (no treatment), capsaicin alone, ionizing radiation (IR) alone and capsaicin and IR. Treatments were administered over a two-week time period. Capsaicin (5 mg/kg/d) or vehicle was administered 3/week by gavage. RT will be delivered to animals in sterile cages as one fraction (6 Gray). Tumours were measured thrice weekly and volumes were calculated. Tumours were fixed and stained for pathological analyses and immunohistochemical evaluation. Results: Exposure of cells to capsaicin (1-10μM) or IR (1-8Gy) caused significant dose-dependent inhibition of colony formation (p<0.001). Combining capsaicin with IR resulted in further significant inhibition of colony formation rates (P<0.001). Western Blot and IHC analysis showed that LNCaP cells treated with capsaicin and/or IR suppressed AR and NFκB, and increase DNA damage. Mice treated with capsaicin or IR alone had a significant reduction in tumour growth overtime (p < 0.001). Mice treated with capsaicin and IR capsaicin had a reduction in the tumour volume greater than either capsaicin alone (p<0.001) or radiation alone (p<0.03). Two mice experienced mild to moderate inflammation of the stomach. No other toxicities were observed. Mechanistic studies revealed that mice administered capsaicin and radiation had an increased yH2AX expression, and significantly lower Ki67 index, AR, and NFκB expression. Conclusion: These studies suggest that capsaicin enhances the effect of radiation through a number of mechanisms including the suppression of NFκB and AR. Citation Format: Natalie A. Venier, Alexandra J. Colquhoun, Laurence Klotz, Neil Fleshner, Vasundara Venkateswaran. Capsaicin enhances the effect of radiation in prostate cancer through NFκB suppression. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1591. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-1591

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicIon Channels and ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207