Notice bibliographique
Résumé
During the past 2 years, the North America Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), in partnership with its fund-raising and research sister organization, the Children's Digestive Health and Nutrition Foundation (CDHNF), has been engaged in developing a research agenda. Members of NASPGHAN developed this document to promote and support research priorities in the discipline. This intense process was the result of a collaborative effort by more than 50 members of the society who have specific areas of expertise and interest. The document was developed to highlight current gaps in knowledge and to point the direction for future advances in the subspecialty. Rather than being all inclusive, the research agenda is intended for use as a springboard for discussions among a variety of partners in government, industry, and disease-related agencies. The plan is to raise funds to support research activities related to advancing knowledge in pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and clinical nutrition. The research agenda also is intended to highlight the need to support excellence in training those who will form the next generation of investigators in the field. The research agenda includes sections on the molecular basis of gastrointestinal diseases, developmental physiology and pathophysiology, secretion and diarrhea, acid-peptic diseases, endoscopy, cystic fibrosis and pancreatic diseases, motility disorders and functional gastrointestinal disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, transplantation, nutrition and obesity, chronic inflammatory bowel disease, and allergy and immunology. The research agenda was presented for consideration at a meeting of the Digestive Disease Interagency Coordinating Committee held on December 11, 2001, at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland. The research agenda also has been presented to leaders in the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. There is considerable interest in using this agenda to develop a new initiative to engage Canadian and American investigators in collaborative research initiatives, which will be supported by intergovernmental agencies. Such an initiative could be used, for example, to support the training of U.S. citizens at centers of excellence in Canada and vice versa. We plan to publish the complete NASPGHAN-CDHNF research agenda as a supplement to the Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition later this year. We hope that this task will meet its goals by enhancing research funding to provide advances in knowledge and thereby promote the digestive health of children.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».