School Area Transportation Safety Guidelines
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Schools across Canada need to consider transportation safety, both on-site and in the surrounding community. More children are being driven to school today than in the past. As a result, transportation facilities at and around schools may not be operating as safely as originally planned, and current practices in school site designs may not be reflective of current modal split. Two specific jurisdictions in Canada, Manitoba Department of Infrastructure and Transportation and the City of Calgary determined that there was a need to prepare a set of guidelines to assist schools with addressing on- and off-site transportation safety concerns. MMM Group was chosen to develop these guidelines for Manitoba and Calgary with the objective of providing schools (in both rural and urban areas) with a step-by-step process to review existing transportation issues, gather information, and work with technical experts to address such issues. Areas of focus common to both studies related to pedestrian safety, parking, both bus and parent pick-up / drop-off areas, and cycling initiatives. The schools reviewed in each jurisdiction included all age groups, and included both the public and, in the case of Calgary, separate school districts. The first stage of both studies was to identify and review literature and best practices from across North America and internationally. All literature reviewed was specific to school, pedestrian, and bicycle safety. Subsequently, input was obtained from residents, students, parents, teachers, and others in each jurisdiction to identify the transportation safety concerns both at, and around a number of schools, utilizing innovative engagement techniques. This input included actual and perceived barriers for stakeholders that limited their modal choices. In the City of Calgary assignment, walking tours of 21 sample schools were conducted during peak periods, online engagement was conducted with stakeholders to identify current travel patterns and barriers to other travel behaviours, and open house-style in-person workshops were held for participants to supplement identified issues and provide input on proposed solutions. In Manitoba, workshops were held with stakeholders at the commencement of the study to identify key issues regarding transportation safety at and around both urban and rural schools. A stakeholder workshop was also held towards the end of project which focused on the “trial use†of the guidelines. The final deliverable in both studies involved a comprehensive report to each jurisdiction which included recommendations to help improve transportation safety and operations for existing school sites, and to identify recommendations that will be useful in developing new school sites.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,045 | 0,020 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».