Narrative Interludes: Musical Tableaux in Eighteenth-Century French Texts by Tili Boon Cuillé (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Book Reviews141 and feel of language, about reproducing similar rhymes, alliterations, onomatopoeias, repetitions, and wordplay, produces better translations. Overall, Surprised in Translation by Mary Ann Caws is a useful tool for helping all students of language and literature to understand the difficulties inherent in trying to put a feeling or a mental image into words, transforming those words into written language, and then translating that language into another. In today's world of global misunderstandings, her book might offer insights into managing the surprising slippage that occurs with daily crosscultural communication. Barbara KlawNorthern Kentucky University Cuillé, Tili Boon. Narrative Interludes: Musical Tableaux in EighteenthCentury French Texts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006. Pp [xi]xxi , 284. ISBN 0-8020-3842-5. $75.00 (Cloth). In this work, Cuillé explores the profoundly interdisciplinary nature of eighteenth-century intellectual culture by demonstrating the ways in which writers and thinkers used musical metaphors to further political debates about aesthetics, nationalism, morality, and gender. Cuillé focuses in particular on the use of musical tableaux, literary devices which suspended fictional narratives and, as she suggests, offered the opportunity for trenchant social and cultural critiques. Operatic quarrels dominated the French intellectual landscape throughout the eighteenth century, from the early deliberations between les Anciens et les Modernes in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, through the Querelle des Bouffons at mid-century and the later Gluck-Piccinni quarrels of the 1770s. In many respects, such debates seem foreign to us today: indeed, why would one get so worked up about the nature and power of opera to move or inspire the soul? But what was at stake, in all of these discussions was not just music, but aesthetics, language, morality—la patrie itself. Cuillé's research focuses on the Querelle des Bouffons, and, in particular on literary responses to the writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, whose arguments, put forward in such works as his Lettre sur la musique française (1753), his Lettre à d'Alembert (1758) and Emile, ou l'éducation (1762), were among the most influential. In the 1753 Lettre, for example, Rousseau argued that Italian was a more musical language than French, a statement which threatened the supremacy of the French language, and with it, the very idea of 'French-ness' itself. Meanwhile, in Emile and the 1758 Lettre, he suggested something altogether more sinister. In a two-pronged argument, he claimed that women were emotionally unruly creatures unable to control their sensibility, and, at the same time, that music itself was equally volatile. Music, he suggested, existed beyond the parameters of mimesis, which meant that the meanings that it conveyed were difficult to discern, and, more significantly, that its effect on the 142Women in French Studies listener could not be controlled (xviii). As such, the relationship between women and music was inevitably fraught with danger. Rousseau's ideas were not well-received by all members of the French intellectual elite, many ofwhom publicly responded to Rousseau's words. Cuillé suggests that their responses can be read along the lines that Rousseau himself put forward. In other words, while one group of writers concerned itself with Rousseau's critique of French nationalism, another contributed to the debate about music as a vehicle for gendered moral disarray. Cuillé herself uses these divisions to structure her work. In the first section, she draws on the writings of Diderot, Cazotte and Beaumarchais to interrogate Rousseau's ideas on national styles, and in the second, she rums to the writings of Charrière, Cottin and Staël to challenge Rousseau's moral understandings about women and music. At the same time, however, she also notes that even though the two 'sides' foregrounded different aspects of the debate, they also worked closely together. As such, the arguments presented can be seen to dovetail into one another. Cuillé explores the ways in which writers and thinkers responded to Rousseau through the medium of literature by using the musical tableau as a method for formulating and propagating their contributions to the debate. Her work relies on a fundamental distinction between musical scenes and musical tableaux. She argues that within the musical scene, a common device in eighteenth-century literature, music is...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».