MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336860617 · doi:10.1353/wfs.2007.0036

Narrative Interludes: Musical Tableaux in Eighteenth-Century French Texts by Tili Boon Cuillé (review)

2007· article· en· W2336860617 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sonja Boon

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen in French studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeMusicalLiteratureFeelingArtAestheticsHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Reviews141 and feel of language, about reproducing similar rhymes, alliterations, onomatopoeias, repetitions, and wordplay, produces better translations. Overall, Surprised in Translation by Mary Ann Caws is a useful tool for helping all students of language and literature to understand the difficulties inherent in trying to put a feeling or a mental image into words, transforming those words into written language, and then translating that language into another. In today's world of global misunderstandings, her book might offer insights into managing the surprising slippage that occurs with daily crosscultural communication. Barbara KlawNorthern Kentucky University Cuillé, Tili Boon. Narrative Interludes: Musical Tableaux in EighteenthCentury French Texts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006. Pp [xi]xxi , 284. ISBN 0-8020-3842-5. $75.00 (Cloth). In this work, Cuillé explores the profoundly interdisciplinary nature of eighteenth-century intellectual culture by demonstrating the ways in which writers and thinkers used musical metaphors to further political debates about aesthetics, nationalism, morality, and gender. Cuillé focuses in particular on the use of musical tableaux, literary devices which suspended fictional narratives and, as she suggests, offered the opportunity for trenchant social and cultural critiques. Operatic quarrels dominated the French intellectual landscape throughout the eighteenth century, from the early deliberations between les Anciens et les Modernes in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, through the Querelle des Bouffons at mid-century and the later Gluck-Piccinni quarrels of the 1770s. In many respects, such debates seem foreign to us today: indeed, why would one get so worked up about the nature and power of opera to move or inspire the soul? But what was at stake, in all of these discussions was not just music, but aesthetics, language, morality—la patrie itself. Cuillé's research focuses on the Querelle des Bouffons, and, in particular on literary responses to the writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, whose arguments, put forward in such works as his Lettre sur la musique française (1753), his Lettre à d'Alembert (1758) and Emile, ou l'éducation (1762), were among the most influential. In the 1753 Lettre, for example, Rousseau argued that Italian was a more musical language than French, a statement which threatened the supremacy of the French language, and with it, the very idea of 'French-ness' itself. Meanwhile, in Emile and the 1758 Lettre, he suggested something altogether more sinister. In a two-pronged argument, he claimed that women were emotionally unruly creatures unable to control their sensibility, and, at the same time, that music itself was equally volatile. Music, he suggested, existed beyond the parameters of mimesis, which meant that the meanings that it conveyed were difficult to discern, and, more significantly, that its effect on the 142Women in French Studies listener could not be controlled (xviii). As such, the relationship between women and music was inevitably fraught with danger. Rousseau's ideas were not well-received by all members of the French intellectual elite, many ofwhom publicly responded to Rousseau's words. Cuillé suggests that their responses can be read along the lines that Rousseau himself put forward. In other words, while one group of writers concerned itself with Rousseau's critique of French nationalism, another contributed to the debate about music as a vehicle for gendered moral disarray. Cuillé herself uses these divisions to structure her work. In the first section, she draws on the writings of Diderot, Cazotte and Beaumarchais to interrogate Rousseau's ideas on national styles, and in the second, she rums to the writings of Charrière, Cottin and Staël to challenge Rousseau's moral understandings about women and music. At the same time, however, she also notes that even though the two 'sides' foregrounded different aspects of the debate, they also worked closely together. As such, the arguments presented can be seen to dovetail into one another. Cuillé explores the ways in which writers and thinkers responded to Rousseau through the medium of literature by using the musical tableau as a method for formulating and propagating their contributions to the debate. Her work relies on a fundamental distinction between musical scenes and musical tableaux. She argues that within the musical scene, a common device in eighteenth-century literature, music is...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen in French studiesSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207