Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As I bid adieu to the Residents’ Page, I do so with regret; it has been a truly enjoyable experience to write, but even more, to read and hear my colleagues’ views in and about this space in Canadian Family Physician. You might have noticed that we missed a few months this year; unfortunately, budgets have been slim in the last 12 months. While Canadian Family Physician regrets being unable to fit a Residents’ Page into every issue, the tradition does live on (but occasionally skips a month). My successor, Dr John Campbell of Memorial University, will be taking over this post starting with the July 2003 issue. Dr Campbell, brave soul, will assume the role of Section of Residents Chair at the same time! You will also hear more from Dr Campbell than you did from previous Residents’ Page editors. For “continuity of care,” this editorial post is being gradually extended to 2 years. As always, Canadian Family Physician staff and Editorial Advisory Board members encourage you to fi ll future pages with refl ections on any and every aspect of family medicine life and training. Taking advantage of this space for the last time, I want to add a short comment on our world today. As you might know, journal articles are written some time in advance of publication. I am writing these words in the fi nal days of March, and though someone in Montreal missed the memo announcing the winter’s end and permitted the unpardonable act of dumping fresh snow on the ground, I struggle to retain the fresh optimism that blew into town with a mild spring breeze last week. It is not just the weather that strains my optimistic view. Armed combat rages in Iraq and a war of a different kind goes on against a mysterious virus in Asia, Europe, and North America. I do not presume to comment on whether the war is “just” though it seems to me, as physician and human being, that any loss of life is diffi cult to justify. We are also reminded of our vulnerability to a different enemy—one viewed only with the aid of a powerful microscope, but lethal all the same. The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak has threatened the medical community by claiming the health and lives of health care workers all around the world. Suddenly, the image of the selfless physician treating lethal diseases in past centuries is reawakened. Doctors and nurses showing signs and symptoms of infection still cared for their patients initially with a sense of altruism that, while admirable, placed their contacts at risk. Perhaps this mysterious illness will serve as a wake-up call to all those (myself included) who feel jaded in the relative safety net of universal precautions. We will become more vigilant; we will be more prepared should another pandemic rear its ugly head. The worst-case scenario has already happened for the families who lost loved ones to SARS. I implore all who care for patients to remember the tenet taught in life support and first aid courses: when rushing to help a victim, put your altruism on momentary hold, reevaluate the situation, and take precautions so that you do not add to the number of people requiring rescue!
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,299 | 0,221 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».