92 Avenue (Edmonton) Arterial Roundabouts: Collaborative Concept Development
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper describes the process, challenges, lessons learned, and cooperation required between the Developer, City and Consultant to develop an innovative and context sensitive concept plan for a developer-initiated 1.6km arterial road in a new growth area in west Edmonton (Secord and Rosenthal Neighbourhoods). The approved plan includes five roundabout intersections, reduced lanes and right-of-way width, and is anticipated to provide superior operations to a conventional four-lane divided arterial roadway with signalized intersections. It has been common practice in Edmonton for Developers to be involved in the design and construction of arterial roads. However, typically concept (functional) planning has been completed by or under the direction of City staff. Strong growth in Edmonton has accelerated demand for new arterial roadways, stretching City planning resources. To meet the demand for planning of arterial roadways in new growth areas, the City recently implemented a process where planning of arterial roads in new areas can be completed by the Developer’s Consultant(s), supported by a City approval process. The desire for Consultants to be innovative and develop new approaches to planning arterials is often stifled by the desire to obtain quick approvals, which are most easily achieved by maintaining the status quo, applying existing standards, and generally not looking outside-the-box for more context-sensitive design solutions. While undertaking the 92 Avenue planning study between 215 Street and 231 Street in Edmonton, Al-Terra Engineering Ltd. identified early on that the arterial was an ideal candidate for an alternate approach. Since the bordering lands were primarily residential, including a large district park, a context-sensitive design was desirable to promote lower traffic speeds and create a pedestrian/bicycle friendly environment. Al-Terra Engineering Ltd. was afforded the rare opportunity by their client, MLC Group Inc., to challenge the status quo and develop an arterial roadway incorporating several roundabout intersections. Although cautious of the alternative design solution, the City provided support and assurances that if the design could be technically supported they would provide due consideration and work with the Consultant to advance the alternate design through to approval. Although the concept planning process took longer than usual due to the detailed reviews required and the educational aspects of the planning study, the plan was recently approved by the City of Edmonton. The Developer, Consultant, and City successfully collaborated to develop a context-sensitive, alternative design solution for this new arterial roadway.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».