MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2341882572

A Totem Pole History: The Work of Lummi Carver Joe Hillaire by Pauline Hillaire (review)

2016· article· en· W2341882572 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael J. Douma

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of American Folklore · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTotemTribePoliticsHistoryArt historyBiographyCarvingIndex (typography)State (computer science)ClassicsLiteratureSociologyArtAnthropologyLawPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A Totem Pole History: The Work of Lummi Carver Joe Hillaire. by Pauline hillaire. ed. Gregory P. Fields. (lincoln: university of nebraska Press, 2013. Pp. lxi + 256, appendix, bibliography, list of contributors, index, 75 illustrations, 4 maps.)The preservation of the lummi tribe's tradition of carving totem poles is an important topic to this volume's contributors. The writers provide an interdisciplinary perspective and have much useful to say about this traditional art in book that, on the surface, provides life history of Joe hillaire. he is the father of Pauline hillaire, who is also known as Scalla, and she is credited as the author of the book. The story is told, however, through compendium of essays, rather than an entirely linear and discursive treatment of material culture. This approach provides certain advantages by way of joining together diverse expertise.The first half of the book is mainly biography. Through the voice of his daughter, we learn that Joe hillaire was not solely an experienced and beloved carver of the lummi tribe of the coast Salish people in the state of Washington, near the canadian border. he also was diplomat and evangelist, even renaissance man in art and politics. in the often overlapping essays, facts from Joe hillaire's life story are in many places repeated in the text. There are moments when it is easy to sympathize hillaire, an always-smiling, friendly ambassador of his people, but one must question whether the complexity of conflict in his life has been passed over in this unabashedly positive treatment.The book would have been made much more readable had its best section, that by barbara brotherton, an art historian at the university of Washington, served as the introduction. only here, after sifting through much introductory material, does the reader find the central point of the call for preserving totem pole carving traditions. brotherton explains that Joe hillaire's work was part of generational strategy of advancing knowledge about native American culture. This strategy arose in the 1930s, when the uS government ended its failed policy of assimilating native Americans. The monumental poles carved by hillaire were important artistic expressions for preserving the traditions of the tribe, not only because the work of carving was performance art that linked the hands of generations, but also because the product was physical manifestation of tribal stories, capable of communicating traditions. That is to say, brotherton values hillaire as link in cultural chain as preserver of folkways. his performance was as important as his craft. What is more, hillaire worked within tradition, but was able to adapt it to modern purposes. brotherton notes that, for the lummi, totem poles served as a strategic invention to record fragile knowledge that had only been orally transmitted (p. 63). but the importance of totem pole carving went further because it allowed for communication those outside of the tribe with the objective of reducing conflict and effecting change (p. 54).Within this context, it becomes easier to see the important role that Joe hillaire played in his community, and readers can better understand why he was involved in political action. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,138
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,005
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,188
Écart entre enseignants0,182 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of American FolkloreMême sujetAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryTravaux en français237 207