A Totem Pole History: The Work of Lummi Carver Joe Hillaire by Pauline Hillaire (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Totem Pole History: The Work of Lummi Carver Joe Hillaire. by Pauline hillaire. ed. Gregory P. Fields. (lincoln: university of nebraska Press, 2013. Pp. lxi + 256, appendix, bibliography, list of contributors, index, 75 illustrations, 4 maps.)The preservation of the lummi tribe's tradition of carving totem poles is an important topic to this volume's contributors. The writers provide an interdisciplinary perspective and have much useful to say about this traditional art in book that, on the surface, provides life history of Joe hillaire. he is the father of Pauline hillaire, who is also known as Scalla, and she is credited as the author of the book. The story is told, however, through compendium of essays, rather than an entirely linear and discursive treatment of material culture. This approach provides certain advantages by way of joining together diverse expertise.The first half of the book is mainly biography. Through the voice of his daughter, we learn that Joe hillaire was not solely an experienced and beloved carver of the lummi tribe of the coast Salish people in the state of Washington, near the canadian border. he also was diplomat and evangelist, even renaissance man in art and politics. in the often overlapping essays, facts from Joe hillaire's life story are in many places repeated in the text. There are moments when it is easy to sympathize hillaire, an always-smiling, friendly ambassador of his people, but one must question whether the complexity of conflict in his life has been passed over in this unabashedly positive treatment.The book would have been made much more readable had its best section, that by barbara brotherton, an art historian at the university of Washington, served as the introduction. only here, after sifting through much introductory material, does the reader find the central point of the call for preserving totem pole carving traditions. brotherton explains that Joe hillaire's work was part of generational strategy of advancing knowledge about native American culture. This strategy arose in the 1930s, when the uS government ended its failed policy of assimilating native Americans. The monumental poles carved by hillaire were important artistic expressions for preserving the traditions of the tribe, not only because the work of carving was performance art that linked the hands of generations, but also because the product was physical manifestation of tribal stories, capable of communicating traditions. That is to say, brotherton values hillaire as link in cultural chain as preserver of folkways. his performance was as important as his craft. What is more, hillaire worked within tradition, but was able to adapt it to modern purposes. brotherton notes that, for the lummi, totem poles served as a strategic invention to record fragile knowledge that had only been orally transmitted (p. 63). but the importance of totem pole carving went further because it allowed for communication those outside of the tribe with the objective of reducing conflict and effecting change (p. 54).Within this context, it becomes easier to see the important role that Joe hillaire played in his community, and readers can better understand why he was involved in political action. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".