MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341882572

A Totem Pole History: The Work of Lummi Carver Joe Hillaire by Pauline Hillaire (review)

2016· article· en· W2341882572 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael J. Douma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of American Folklore · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTotemTribePoliticsHistoryArt historyBiographyCarvingIndex (typography)State (computer science)ClassicsLiteratureSociologyArtAnthropologyLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Totem Pole History: The Work of Lummi Carver Joe Hillaire. by Pauline hillaire. ed. Gregory P. Fields. (lincoln: university of nebraska Press, 2013. Pp. lxi + 256, appendix, bibliography, list of contributors, index, 75 illustrations, 4 maps.)The preservation of the lummi tribe's tradition of carving totem poles is an important topic to this volume's contributors. The writers provide an interdisciplinary perspective and have much useful to say about this traditional art in book that, on the surface, provides life history of Joe hillaire. he is the father of Pauline hillaire, who is also known as Scalla, and she is credited as the author of the book. The story is told, however, through compendium of essays, rather than an entirely linear and discursive treatment of material culture. This approach provides certain advantages by way of joining together diverse expertise.The first half of the book is mainly biography. Through the voice of his daughter, we learn that Joe hillaire was not solely an experienced and beloved carver of the lummi tribe of the coast Salish people in the state of Washington, near the canadian border. he also was diplomat and evangelist, even renaissance man in art and politics. in the often overlapping essays, facts from Joe hillaire's life story are in many places repeated in the text. There are moments when it is easy to sympathize hillaire, an always-smiling, friendly ambassador of his people, but one must question whether the complexity of conflict in his life has been passed over in this unabashedly positive treatment.The book would have been made much more readable had its best section, that by barbara brotherton, an art historian at the university of Washington, served as the introduction. only here, after sifting through much introductory material, does the reader find the central point of the call for preserving totem pole carving traditions. brotherton explains that Joe hillaire's work was part of generational strategy of advancing knowledge about native American culture. This strategy arose in the 1930s, when the uS government ended its failed policy of assimilating native Americans. The monumental poles carved by hillaire were important artistic expressions for preserving the traditions of the tribe, not only because the work of carving was performance art that linked the hands of generations, but also because the product was physical manifestation of tribal stories, capable of communicating traditions. That is to say, brotherton values hillaire as link in cultural chain as preserver of folkways. his performance was as important as his craft. What is more, hillaire worked within tradition, but was able to adapt it to modern purposes. brotherton notes that, for the lummi, totem poles served as a strategic invention to record fragile knowledge that had only been orally transmitted (p. 63). but the importance of totem pole carving went further because it allowed for communication those outside of the tribe with the objective of reducing conflict and effecting change (p. 54).Within this context, it becomes easier to see the important role that Joe hillaire played in his community, and readers can better understand why he was involved in political action. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of American FolkloreSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207