MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2342923703 · doi:10.1080/02722010009481050

Cultural Imperialism and Cultural Sovereignty: U.S.-Canadian Cultural Relations

2000· article· en· W2342923703 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin V. Mulcahy

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Review of Canadian Studies · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSovereigntyCultural imperialismCultural homogenizationPolitical scienceCultural identitySociologyLawPoliticsGlobalizationNegotiation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Canada and the United States, like most nations, engage in a variety of bilateral and multilateral activities that promote international cooperation. Although admittedly of lesser importance than military or economic force, relations--including the exchange of professors, students, and various professionals, as well as tours of performing arts companies and visual arts exhibits and informational services (both print and broadcast)--are important in promoting international understanding and good will. (1) The particulars of the exchange programs between Canada and the United States are not, however, the subject of this discussion. Important as such exchanges are, relations between these neighboring nations have been dominated by international trade agreements as these affect their respective industries. To a degree that is highly unusual considering the typically arcane provisions of such agreements, the details of U.S.-Canadian understandings governing the sector have been the subject of highly emotional political debates. These debates have been especially vocal in Canada where demands for a cultural exemption, as protection against the onslaught of U.S. cultural imperialism, are a staple of discourse for many intellectuals, artists, and lobbyists, as well as among the general public. For Americans, these issues are less noticed except by those in the entertainment industry and the trade negotiators in Washington. It should be noted that Canada is not alone among nations in its contentions with American imperialism. Figure 1 represents some generalized observations on policies that are related to a broader four-nation study of public patronage with which this writer is involved. (2) With a liberal political culture that is characterized by limited government, internationalism, and an open society, Canada stands somewhere between France and the United States in its degree of protectionism and overall intensity of politics. Norway, like other small-language and social-democratic societies, pursues a of English-language telecommunications and support for highly localistic and folkloristic expressions. Canada, on the other hand, lacks both the millennial-old culture and territorial isolation of Norway and the French tradition of a hegemonic culture and the national government as l'etat culturel. The United States, of course, is the great exception, with a regnant popular culture that is able to indemnify its costs over a populous and prosperous society that is largely immune to expressions that do not project an American sensibility. In effect, the United States can afford to have a cultural open-door policy because it has little to fear from foreign competition. For Canada, however, free trade raises the spectre of standing unprotected against the forces of American annexation. This discussion will survey the debate over U.S. imperialism and Canadian concerns for sovereignty, with particular reference to the international trade agreements of the past decade. The emphasis will be on the Canadian response to the commercial prerogatives asserted by the United States for its industries which, in the view of many Canadians, have already achieved a hegemony so powerful as to threaten their national identity. That this is an understandable, if debatable, proposition is the subject of the first section on the Small Nation, Big Neighbor syndrome. The second section will discuss the issue of identity and Canadian demands for protection. An overview of the Canadian assertion of a cultural exemption in its international trade agreements with the United States will be discussed in the third section. Sections four and five will focus on the two major industries affected: publishing (periodicals, books, bookstores) and the audiovisual (movies, television, radio). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,309
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,004
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,314
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Review of Canadian StudiesMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207