MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2345095749 · doi:10.14288/1.0088637

Maternal caregiving throughout the lifespan: an ethnographic study of the experiences of mothers of adult children who sustain traumatic brain injury

2009· article· en· W2345095749 sur OpenAlexaff
Barbara Joan Gladys Tabata

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEthnographyPsychologyTraumatic brain injuryDevelopmental psychologyMedicineGerontologyPsychiatrySociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The survival rate of persons who sustain traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to increase due to recent technological advances in emergency medicine, and use of helmets and seat belts. The survivors, who are often young adults, generally return to their family of origin to receive the care they need. Although it is widely acknowledged that TBI impacts on these families, particularly the mothers who play a crucial role in the caregiving, little is known about the changes that occur in the mothers' lives. The purpose of this study was to further understand the experiences of mothers whose lifespan expectations are altered when they become primary caregivers to their previously independent adult children. Using the ethnography method and drawing from Ryan's (1993) a "Lifetime of Mothering" conceptual framework as a basis to collect the data, constant comparative analysis was used to analyze the data. This approach resulted in a descriptive analysis that conveyed a common conceptualization of the experience. Participants were obtained through the British Columbia Brain Injury Society, Greater Victoria Hospital Society (now known as the Capital Health Region) and the "snowball" technique. Of eight mothers who were interviewed, six fit the criteria of the study. Interviews were one to two hours in length. Of the six mothers, length of time post-injury ranged from 3 years nine months to 11 years, the average length of time was 7 years 6 months. Four of the adult children were female. At the time of the interviews, three adult children with TBI lived in their mothers' homes, two had just started to live independently, and one lived in close proximity. The data analysis yielded the core category "The Experience of Enduring". The central components of the mothers' descriptions of Enduring were the processes of Becoming a Caregiver, Grasping Reality and Carrying Responsibility. Although each mother's situation was found to be unique, three major Tactics were used by all when Enduring the Experience that included: Pulling from Within; Comparing in Order to Put a Face On It; and Dealing With It. Dealing With It involved Inside Work and Outside Work. Inside Work encompassed activities directed at holding the mothers and their family together. Outside Work entailed activities dealt with outside the home that were directly related to the caregiving experience. The uniqueness of each mother's situation was influenced by three Intervening Conditions: Mothers' Individual Ways; Availability of Services; and Economic Influences. As a consequence of Enduring The Experience, all of the women experienced both Gains and Losses. These outcomes had a direct bearing on their Experience of Enduring. Mothers lives are permanently affected by the caregiving experience. The constant caregiving without adequate resources is particularly onerous. Ongoing caregiving of children with TBI has consequences which are both positive and negative. Mothers with TBI caregiving responsibilities over time develop strategies for coping. Based on the findings of the study, implications for nursing practice, education, and research were identified to provide nurses with the knowledge and skills to render support to these ongoing caregivers.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,027

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,003
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Même sujetGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health→Travaux en français237 207→