MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2345095749 · doi:10.14288/1.0088637

Maternal caregiving throughout the lifespan: an ethnographic study of the experiences of mothers of adult children who sustain traumatic brain injury

2009· article· en· W2345095749 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara Joan Gladys Tabata

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnographyPsychologyTraumatic brain injuryDevelopmental psychologyMedicineGerontologyPsychiatrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The survival rate of persons who sustain traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to increase due to recent technological advances in emergency medicine, and use of helmets and seat belts. The survivors, who are often young adults, generally return to their family of origin to receive the care they need. Although it is widely acknowledged that TBI impacts on these families, particularly the mothers who play a crucial role in the caregiving, little is known about the changes that occur in the mothers' lives. The purpose of this study was to further understand the experiences of mothers whose lifespan expectations are altered when they become primary caregivers to their previously independent adult children. Using the ethnography method and drawing from Ryan's (1993) a "Lifetime of Mothering" conceptual framework as a basis to collect the data, constant comparative analysis was used to analyze the data. This approach resulted in a descriptive analysis that conveyed a common conceptualization of the experience. Participants were obtained through the British Columbia Brain Injury Society, Greater Victoria Hospital Society (now known as the Capital Health Region) and the "snowball" technique. Of eight mothers who were interviewed, six fit the criteria of the study. Interviews were one to two hours in length. Of the six mothers, length of time post-injury ranged from 3 years nine months to 11 years, the average length of time was 7 years 6 months. Four of the adult children were female. At the time of the interviews, three adult children with TBI lived in their mothers' homes, two had just started to live independently, and one lived in close proximity. The data analysis yielded the core category "The Experience of Enduring". The central components of the mothers' descriptions of Enduring were the processes of Becoming a Caregiver, Grasping Reality and Carrying Responsibility. Although each mother's situation was found to be unique, three major Tactics were used by all when Enduring the Experience that included: Pulling from Within; Comparing in Order to Put a Face On It; and Dealing With It. Dealing With It involved Inside Work and Outside Work. Inside Work encompassed activities directed at holding the mothers and their family together. Outside Work entailed activities dealt with outside the home that were directly related to the caregiving experience. The uniqueness of each mother's situation was influenced by three Intervening Conditions: Mothers' Individual Ways; Availability of Services; and Economic Influences. As a consequence of Enduring The Experience, all of the women experienced both Gains and Losses. These outcomes had a direct bearing on their Experience of Enduring. Mothers lives are permanently affected by the caregiving experience. The constant caregiving without adequate resources is particularly onerous. Ongoing caregiving of children with TBI has consequences which are both positive and negative. Mothers with TBI caregiving responsibilities over time develop strategies for coping. Based on the findings of the study, implications for nursing practice, education, and research were identified to provide nurses with the knowledge and skills to render support to these ongoing caregivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→