Answering a four decade-old question on epicuticular wax biosynthesis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In this issue of Journal of Experimental Botany (pages 2715–2730) Schneider et al. report the identity of three genes from barley described in the 1970s as important for the synthesis of β-diketone cuticular waxes, thereby revealing a novel polyketide synthase pathway responsible for their production. It is a perfect example of how modern sequencing technologies can resolve age-old questions on important food crops. All land plants possess a lipophilic layer coating their aerial surfaces: a cuticle. It consists of waxes embedded within and overlaying an esterified polymer of oxygenated fatty acids and glycerol (cutin). As such, plant cuticles form one of the largest biological interfaces on the planet, providing the first points of contact with the surrounding, often hostile, environment. The key function of cuticle is to prevent non-stomatal water loss, but other functions include defense against bacterial and fungal pathogens, mediating interactions with insects, and protection from excess levels of ultraviolet radiation. Cuticular waxes are chemically complex mixtures of hydrophobic molecules, most typically even and odd chain fatty acid derivatives of carbon lengths C24 and higher. Epicuticular waxes form the outermost layer of cuticle and often form crystals, imparting a whitish bloom to the organ surface. The amount and composition of cuticular wax varies widely between plant species and even between organs of the same plant; and cuticle chemistry can also change during development of the organ and is altered by environmental conditions. β-diketones are very-long-chain (typically C29–C31) oxygenated hydrocarbons that have long been known to be cuticular wax components of some plants (Horn and Lamberton, 1962; Tulloch and Weenink, 1966; Jackson, 1971; von Wettstein-Knowles, 1972; Evans et al., 1975; Jenks et al., 2002). They are well described in the cuticular waxes of diverse plant species, including Eucalyptus, Rhododendron and Hosta. However, they are best described in graminaceous species (e.g. barley, wheat and oats) (Box 1). Knowledge of β-diketone biosynthesis has come from extensive genetic and radiotracer feeding studies in barley by Penny von Wettstein-Knowles and colleagues (von Wettstein-Knowles, 1995; 2012). The largest collection of cuticular wax-deficient mutants, termed eceriferum (cer), is in barley, consisting of more than 1500 mutants in about 75 complementation groups. The Cer-cqu cluster, which affects β-diketone, hydroxy β-diketone and esterified alkan-2-ol production, is represented by over 500 distinct mutations and is made up of three complementation groups (Cer-c, -q and -u) (Box 1). The identities of the genes in this locus have remained elusive – until now. Box 1. Epicuticular waxes of barley flag leaf sheaths (A) Wild type (WT) barley ‘Bonus’ and cer-c, cer-q, and cer-u mutants demonstrating the glossy phenotypes of the cer-c and cer-q mutants plus reduced wax on the cer-u mutant resulting from reductions in β-diketones and their derivatives. ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».