MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2350493921 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-03/2/266

Interactions Between Positive and Negative Electrodes in Li-Ion Cells Operated at High Temperature and High Voltage

2016· article· en· W2350493921 sur OpenAlexaff
Deijun Xiong, Rémi Petibon, Mengyun Nie, Lin Ma, Jian Xia, J. R. Dahn

Notice bibliographique

RevueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésElectrolyteElectrodeGloveboxAnalytical Chemistry (journal)GraphiteMaterials scienceChemistryComposite materialChromatographyOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction When NMC/graphite Li-ion cells are operated at high temperature and a cut-off potential higher than 4.2 V, generated gaseous products and oxidized species which could passivate the positive electrode and/or dissolve in the bulk electrolyte could reach the negative electrode and be reduced there.1,2 In order to study electrode/electrode interactions, pouch bags were used to separate the two electrodes, so that interactions between two electrodes would be impossible. Pouch bags containing only the charged negative or positive electrode can be used as a simple tool to obtain valuable information concerning the consequences of the absence of an interaction with the other charged electrode. Experimental Before electrolyte filling, dry (no electrolyte) NMC442/graphite (240 mAh) pouch cells were cut below the seal and vacuum dried at 80°C for 14 h. The pouch cells were filled with 0.9 g of 1M LiPF6 in EC:EMC (3:7 by weight) (control electrolyte) plus 2 % vinylene carbonate (VC), 2% prop-1-ene-1,3-sultone (PES) or 2% pyridine-boron trifluoride (PBF) in an argon-filled glove box and vacuum sealed in the same glove box. All the additives were added by weight percentage. After electrolyte filling, cells were placed in a temperature box at 40. ± 0.1°C and held at 1.5 V for 24 h. They were then charged to 3.8 V at C/20, and transferred to a glove box for degassing (cut open below the seal and re-sealed under vacuum). After degassing, they were charged to either 4.4 V, then discharged to 2.8 V and charged back to the same charge cutoff voltage until the holding period for the NMC442/graphite cells reached 30 hours. Four cells either at 4.2 or 4.4 V were moved to a 60°C temperature box for storage. The other cells were transferred to the glovebox and dissembled there. The delithiated NMC442 electrodes collected from the pouch cell were inserted into pouch bags with 0.3 g EMC. The addition of 0.3 g EMC to the pouch bags created a similar electrolyte environment as in the original pouch cells, because EC and LiPF6 were still left in the electrode and only about 0.3 g of EMC evaporated from the positive electrodes. Figure 1 shows photographs to illustrate the process used to make and test pouch cells and pouch bags. Results and discussion Figure 2 shows gas evolution for pouch bags containing lithiated graphite electrodes which were taken from pouch cells with control electrolyte, electrolyte with 2% PES, 2% VC and 2% PBF. No volume changes were detected for these pouch bags during approximately 500 h storage at 60°C. This suggests that parasitic reactions between the lithiated graphite and electrolyte do not contribute to gas generation at 60 °C. Figure 3 shows the volume change versus time for pouch cells with control electrolyte, or electrolyte with 2% PES, 2% VC or 2% PBF and pouch bags containing charged positive electrodes taken from brother pouch cells during a 500 h storage period at 60°C. Figure 3 shows that the volume of the pouch cells and pouch bags containing the charged positive electrodes increased with time. Figure 3 also shows that the pouch bags containing the delithiated NMC442 electrodes produced almost two times more gas than the corresponding pouch cells during the storage period. This suggests that some gaseous products generated at the positive electrode are consumed at the negative electrode in a full cell. Pouch bags with the delithiated NMC442 electrode taken from pouch cells at 4.4 V produced more gas than those taken from pouch cells at 4.2 V. This means, unsurprisingly, that delithiated NMC442 electrodes at a higher potential oxidize electrolyte at a higher rate. Pouch bags containing the washed charged NMC442 electrode (DMC washing) + EC/EMC produced gas at a higher rate than those containing a charged NMC442 electrode without washing. This suggests that the presence of LiPF6 can affect the parasitic reactions at the positive electrode that cause gaseous products. The above results suggest that oxidized species such as gaseous products generated at the positive electrode can be consumed at the negative electrode leading to a smaller volume expansion in pouch cells than pouch bags. The “clean-up” of other oxidized species by the lithiated graphite electrode resulting in a lower rate of impedance increase at the positive electrode will be discussed. References 1. S. E. Sloop, J. B. Kerr, and K. Kinoshita, J. Power Sources, 119–121, 330–337 (2003). 2. S. Li, C. Chen, and J. Dahn, Meet. Abstr., MA2013-02, 1167–1167 (2013). Figure 1

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,232 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueECS Meeting AbstractsMême sujetAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchTravaux en français237 207