MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2350493921 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-03/2/266

Interactions Between Positive and Negative Electrodes in Li-Ion Cells Operated at High Temperature and High Voltage

2016· article· en· W2350493921 on OpenAlexaff
Deijun Xiong, Rémi Petibon, Mengyun Nie, Lin Ma, Jian Xia, J. R. Dahn

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteElectrodeGloveboxAnalytical Chemistry (journal)GraphiteMaterials scienceChemistryComposite materialChromatographyOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction When NMC/graphite Li-ion cells are operated at high temperature and a cut-off potential higher than 4.2 V, generated gaseous products and oxidized species which could passivate the positive electrode and/or dissolve in the bulk electrolyte could reach the negative electrode and be reduced there.1,2 In order to study electrode/electrode interactions, pouch bags were used to separate the two electrodes, so that interactions between two electrodes would be impossible. Pouch bags containing only the charged negative or positive electrode can be used as a simple tool to obtain valuable information concerning the consequences of the absence of an interaction with the other charged electrode. Experimental Before electrolyte filling, dry (no electrolyte) NMC442/graphite (240 mAh) pouch cells were cut below the seal and vacuum dried at 80°C for 14 h. The pouch cells were filled with 0.9 g of 1M LiPF6 in EC:EMC (3:7 by weight) (control electrolyte) plus 2 % vinylene carbonate (VC), 2% prop-1-ene-1,3-sultone (PES) or 2% pyridine-boron trifluoride (PBF) in an argon-filled glove box and vacuum sealed in the same glove box. All the additives were added by weight percentage. After electrolyte filling, cells were placed in a temperature box at 40. ± 0.1°C and held at 1.5 V for 24 h. They were then charged to 3.8 V at C/20, and transferred to a glove box for degassing (cut open below the seal and re-sealed under vacuum). After degassing, they were charged to either 4.4 V, then discharged to 2.8 V and charged back to the same charge cutoff voltage until the holding period for the NMC442/graphite cells reached 30 hours. Four cells either at 4.2 or 4.4 V were moved to a 60°C temperature box for storage. The other cells were transferred to the glovebox and dissembled there. The delithiated NMC442 electrodes collected from the pouch cell were inserted into pouch bags with 0.3 g EMC. The addition of 0.3 g EMC to the pouch bags created a similar electrolyte environment as in the original pouch cells, because EC and LiPF6 were still left in the electrode and only about 0.3 g of EMC evaporated from the positive electrodes. Figure 1 shows photographs to illustrate the process used to make and test pouch cells and pouch bags. Results and discussion Figure 2 shows gas evolution for pouch bags containing lithiated graphite electrodes which were taken from pouch cells with control electrolyte, electrolyte with 2% PES, 2% VC and 2% PBF. No volume changes were detected for these pouch bags during approximately 500 h storage at 60°C. This suggests that parasitic reactions between the lithiated graphite and electrolyte do not contribute to gas generation at 60 °C. Figure 3 shows the volume change versus time for pouch cells with control electrolyte, or electrolyte with 2% PES, 2% VC or 2% PBF and pouch bags containing charged positive electrodes taken from brother pouch cells during a 500 h storage period at 60°C. Figure 3 shows that the volume of the pouch cells and pouch bags containing the charged positive electrodes increased with time. Figure 3 also shows that the pouch bags containing the delithiated NMC442 electrodes produced almost two times more gas than the corresponding pouch cells during the storage period. This suggests that some gaseous products generated at the positive electrode are consumed at the negative electrode in a full cell. Pouch bags with the delithiated NMC442 electrode taken from pouch cells at 4.4 V produced more gas than those taken from pouch cells at 4.2 V. This means, unsurprisingly, that delithiated NMC442 electrodes at a higher potential oxidize electrolyte at a higher rate. Pouch bags containing the washed charged NMC442 electrode (DMC washing) + EC/EMC produced gas at a higher rate than those containing a charged NMC442 electrode without washing. This suggests that the presence of LiPF6 can affect the parasitic reactions at the positive electrode that cause gaseous products. The above results suggest that oxidized species such as gaseous products generated at the positive electrode can be consumed at the negative electrode leading to a smaller volume expansion in pouch cells than pouch bags. The “clean-up” of other oxidized species by the lithiated graphite electrode resulting in a lower rate of impedance increase at the positive electrode will be discussed. References 1. S. E. Sloop, J. B. Kerr, and K. Kinoshita, J. Power Sources, 119–121, 330–337 (2003). 2. S. Li, C. Chen, and J. Dahn, Meet. Abstr., MA2013-02, 1167–1167 (2013). Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207