138 THE EFFECTS OF NIGHT CALL ON PEDIATRIC RESIDENTS' COGNITION AND PERFORMANCE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h3>Introduction</h3> The long hours associated with residency training are often thought to contribute to medical errors. Conventionally, long hours were considered vital to medical education, but resident fatigue may result in unfavourable learning experiences. Studies based on fatigued American residents9 cognition and performance has given equivocal results. Disappointingly, few studies in Canada have thoroughly investigated this controversy. <h3>Methods</h3> The cognitive and skills performances of 11 pediatric residents working night call duty at British Columbia Children9s Hospital were measured using a project specific, computer based test module. Performance evaluations were performed under two situations call (post 24 hours in hospital) and non-call (post regular nights sleep). Call duty testing was performed at pre-call, mid-call and post-call. Non-call testing was completed during consecutive non-call shifts. To limit learning, the residents were randomly assigned a condition order. The test battery consisted of previously validated measures sensitive to sleep deprivation: simple, choice and incompatible reaction time; digit vigilance, and varied mapping memory recall. A performance task designed to evaluate medical calculations was also added. <h3>Results</h3> More than 42% of residents report working at least 80 hours per week and 64% claim their call duty exceeds 26 hours. Scores of choice and incompatible reaction time were significantly lower in the call condition. Vigilance reaction time was greater in session three compared to session one; however, this interaction was consistent for both conditions. Significantly more time was required to complete the four category varied mapping as compared to the two category condition. Residents performed significantly faster and with fewer errors in consecutive administrations of the medical calculations exam for both call and non-call conditions. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Cognitive performance was impaired during the call condition for certain tasks and not for others; however, specific reductions in the sensitive measures could not be isolated to the mid-call or post-call sessions. Our results were unable to support the hypothesis that residents are impaired post-call to the point where significant cognitive and performance deficits materialize. On the other hand, residents may be moderately impaired, but their development of fatigue countermeasures encourages a safe level of performance.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».