Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Natasha L. Henry. Day: Celebrating Freedom in Canada. Toronto: Dundurn Press, 2010. 225 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Illustrations. $28.99 sc. Natasha Henry's Day: Celebrating Freedom in Canada examines the evolution and meaning of Day across Canada. Based on archival research, the author judiciously maps the celebration that began in the 19th century and is often resurrected in various cities across Canada in the 21st century. Henry convincingly demonstrates the multiple functions of the August 1st celebration as well as the protracted struggle over how to acknowledge such a significant historic event. Initially, Day was organized and held to commemorate the abolition of slavery in Canada with St. Catherine's being the site of the first recorded celebration in Ontario, held on August 20, 1835. For the newly manumitted, Day provided an outlet to reflect upon the vast possibilities of freedom from enslavement. Over time, the event would evolve to mean much more. Henry demonstrates throughout the book how Emancipation Day provided the ideal public stage for native-born and immigrant Canadians to express overwhelming gratitude for liberty, embrace their citizenship, and to chart the course for the future (146). The format of the Day celebration, at least in its early development, reflected the religious and cultural values of the African Canadian community. The day began with a church service organized around the theme of giving thanks to God from deliverance from bondage (28). Ministers taught about the atrocities of slavery as well how to envision a new future, while the hymns sung reflected the spirit of thanksgiving. Parades were an integral aspect of the August 1st festivities and included the use of specific emblems, which served as reminders of how far Blacks had come. As a reflection of people's history of service to the British and later to the Canadian military, military marching bands led the procession. Another component of the Celebration was annual feasts, luncheons, picnics and formal dinners. Henry asserts that the act of eating together, a liberty they did not have under slavery, served a symbolic purpose for the newly manumitted. Toasts, resolutions, and speeches were also features of the Day celebrations. Beyond the festivity of the parades, Henry maintains that the various activities not only reinforced a sense of the unity, but also serve as evidence of Black Canadians helping one another to strengthen their (29). While the core purpose of Day was recognized by the African-Canadian community, how to celebrate the day was a contested issue for some members. Reverend Jones from Hamilton, for example, felt that August 1st should be spent quietly focusing on the major issues affecting the community, such as the establishment and support of community institutions, [and] the promotion of morals and values . …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,044 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».