Bibliographic record
Abstract
Natasha L. Henry. Day: Celebrating Freedom in Canada. Toronto: Dundurn Press, 2010. 225 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Illustrations. $28.99 sc. Natasha Henry's Day: Celebrating Freedom in Canada examines the evolution and meaning of Day across Canada. Based on archival research, the author judiciously maps the celebration that began in the 19th century and is often resurrected in various cities across Canada in the 21st century. Henry convincingly demonstrates the multiple functions of the August 1st celebration as well as the protracted struggle over how to acknowledge such a significant historic event. Initially, Day was organized and held to commemorate the abolition of slavery in Canada with St. Catherine's being the site of the first recorded celebration in Ontario, held on August 20, 1835. For the newly manumitted, Day provided an outlet to reflect upon the vast possibilities of freedom from enslavement. Over time, the event would evolve to mean much more. Henry demonstrates throughout the book how Emancipation Day provided the ideal public stage for native-born and immigrant Canadians to express overwhelming gratitude for liberty, embrace their citizenship, and to chart the course for the future (146). The format of the Day celebration, at least in its early development, reflected the religious and cultural values of the African Canadian community. The day began with a church service organized around the theme of giving thanks to God from deliverance from bondage (28). Ministers taught about the atrocities of slavery as well how to envision a new future, while the hymns sung reflected the spirit of thanksgiving. Parades were an integral aspect of the August 1st festivities and included the use of specific emblems, which served as reminders of how far Blacks had come. As a reflection of people's history of service to the British and later to the Canadian military, military marching bands led the procession. Another component of the Celebration was annual feasts, luncheons, picnics and formal dinners. Henry asserts that the act of eating together, a liberty they did not have under slavery, served a symbolic purpose for the newly manumitted. Toasts, resolutions, and speeches were also features of the Day celebrations. Beyond the festivity of the parades, Henry maintains that the various activities not only reinforced a sense of the unity, but also serve as evidence of Black Canadians helping one another to strengthen their (29). While the core purpose of Day was recognized by the African-Canadian community, how to celebrate the day was a contested issue for some members. Reverend Jones from Hamilton, for example, felt that August 1st should be spent quietly focusing on the major issues affecting the community, such as the establishment and support of community institutions, [and] the promotion of morals and values . …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".