504 EVALUATION OF AN ORAL HEALTH PROMOTION PROGRAM IN A REMOTE FIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h3>Background</h3> Poor oral hygiene is associated with an increased risk of diabetes, coronary artery disease and premature labor; all major issues for First Nations populations. For over 3 years our university has shared a collaborative health prevention and education partnership with a remote Tsimshian community in Northern British Columbia promoting oral health amongst their children and providing unique educational opportunities for pediatric residents. <h3>Method</h3> After an extensive dialogue between the Band Council and our Residency Training Committee, a school-based program centered on brushing, flossing, and topical fluoride began. Pre-intervention assessment and training were done jointly by the departments of Dentistry and Pediatrics. Residents and a faculty supervisor stay in the community every 2 months to contribute ongoing support, age-appropriate educational modules for the children, and collaborative health care services (acute and preventive) with the Health Director and the local nursing station. Multidisciplinary evaluation is ongoing and includes oral, general health, community awareness and involvement and educational parameters. <h3>Results</h3> 80 children (100% of those of school age) were enrolled. Initially the majority of children had evidence of poor oral health, and knowledge and practices were limited. Less than 20% of the children were decay free, and the mean decay missing filled score (DMFS) for preK children was 9.9 (SD 12.1); for school aged children (k–12) the DMFS score was 5.7 (SD 6.2). One year later, 41% of the children enrolled in the study have no new cavities. Currently, all the children in the community remain enrolled in the program. The results are seen as significant by the community. 45 pediatric trainees and 18 faculty members have spent time in the community; our trainees evaluate their involvement as an educational highlight in their training; and the program has received awards from Aboriginal and University agencies. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The ‘Brighter Smiles program’ has synergistically combined the culture and knowledge of a vibrant First Nation’s community with those of a University Residency program committed to advocacy for child health and innovative resident education. Key attitudes have changed for both groups and a measurable improvement in oral health has occurred.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».