MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W238346458

Dying Planet, Deadly People: "Race"-Sex Anxieties and Alternative Globalizations

2005· article· en· W238346458 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andil Gosine

Notice bibliographique

RevueSocial Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSex work and related issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSolidaritySociologyGlobalizationHuman rightsDemocracyCharterPolitical economyPolitical scienceLawPolitics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

WHAT WERE ONCE HERALDED AS ANTI-GLOBALIZATION MOVEMENTS ARE FAST becoming reconstituted as networks championing globalizations. No longer presented as entirely opposed to the intensification of cross-border economic relationships (as was the case in the 1990s), activists now appear to place much more emphasis on negotiations about the form of these relationships. Some organizations, such as those engaged in the World Social Forum meetings, propose a in solidarity that prioritizes universal human rights and the achievement of democratic international systems and institutions the service of social justice, equality, and the sovereignty of peoples (Revised World Social Forum Charter of Principles, in Sen et al., 2004: 70). Others advocate from below, whereby people at the grass roots around the world link up to impose their own needs and interests on the process of globalization (Brecher, Costello, and Smith, 2000). A key reason for this shifting emphasis is found in Stephanie Guilloud's Open letter to protestors: I visited [Nicaragua] after the Seattle protests and engaged in a conversation with a good friend.... He struggles to keep good-paying work and hide his Sandinista identity in a time when Nicaragua is the second poorest country in this hemisphere. He said, Global finance institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the WTO are killing us. But without them, we would die. What do you propose to replace them? I felt a profound shift in my understanding, and I appreciate his challenge (http://colours.mahost.org/articles/guilloud.html). The growing consensus is that critique is simply not enough: alternative institutions and relationships are needed. Guilloud's position is noteworthy given her participation in Colours of Resistance (COR). A Montreal-based transnational think-tank/action-tank of nonwhite, activists, CoR was formed as a response: to [a] growing feeling of a gap between what has been labelled as the anti-globalization movement in the West and the day-to-day organizing efforts in communities of colour to resist the impacts of global capitalism (http://colours.mahost.org/index.html). CoR's web site hosts bulletin board discussions, articles, and resource tools that consider, critique, and propose resolution to the myriad ways in which race-racism is implicated in the pursuit and intensification of capital accumulation, as well as in the responses formed in opposition to it. Guilloud's (and many of her CoR colleagues') embrace of globalizations bears witness to the salience of this approach across movements, including ones more critically engaged in questions about power and justice. CoR participants cast a wide net in their analysis of race-racism and globalization, and address diverse themes in their contributions to the site, including free trade, privatization of public services, war and terrorism, immigration, marginalization of indigenous communities, environmental justice, colonialism, American/AngloSaxon imperialism, North-South relations, as well as same-sex marriage, prisons, punk rock, and black liberation. This essay attempts to contribute to this already lively debate by examining the work of race-racism in constitutions of one popularly touted globalization, global environmentalism. Referencing work by Richard Dyer, Hazel Carby, bell hooks, Ali Rattansi, and others, I bring attention to the ways in which sex-race anxieties shape explanations of global environmental degradation, as well as responses formed and promoted by environmentalists. I make no claims to represent the full breadth of activities, conversations, and ideas that comprise environmentalism, nor do I provide a full analysis of the movements' many conflicts and contradictions. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,837
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,977

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,338
Écart entre enseignants0,314 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSocial Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World OrderMême sujetSex work and related issuesTravaux en français237 207