Dying Planet, Deadly People: "Race"-Sex Anxieties and Alternative Globalizations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
WHAT WERE ONCE HERALDED AS ANTI-GLOBALIZATION MOVEMENTS ARE FAST becoming reconstituted as networks championing globalizations. No longer presented as entirely opposed to the intensification of cross-border economic relationships (as was the case in the 1990s), activists now appear to place much more emphasis on negotiations about the form of these relationships. Some organizations, such as those engaged in the World Social Forum meetings, propose a in solidarity that prioritizes universal human rights and the achievement of democratic international systems and institutions the service of social justice, equality, and the sovereignty of peoples (Revised World Social Forum Charter of Principles, in Sen et al., 2004: 70). Others advocate from below, whereby people at the grass roots around the world link up to impose their own needs and interests on the process of globalization (Brecher, Costello, and Smith, 2000). A key reason for this shifting emphasis is found in Stephanie Guilloud's Open letter to protestors: I visited [Nicaragua] after the Seattle protests and engaged in a conversation with a good friend.... He struggles to keep good-paying work and hide his Sandinista identity in a time when Nicaragua is the second poorest country in this hemisphere. He said, Global finance institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the WTO are killing us. But without them, we would die. What do you propose to replace them? I felt a profound shift in my understanding, and I appreciate his challenge (http://colours.mahost.org/articles/guilloud.html). The growing consensus is that critique is simply not enough: alternative institutions and relationships are needed. Guilloud's position is noteworthy given her participation in Colours of Resistance (COR). A Montreal-based transnational think-tank/action-tank of nonwhite, activists, CoR was formed as a response: to [a] growing feeling of a gap between what has been labelled as the anti-globalization movement in the West and the day-to-day organizing efforts in communities of colour to resist the impacts of global capitalism (http://colours.mahost.org/index.html). CoR's web site hosts bulletin board discussions, articles, and resource tools that consider, critique, and propose resolution to the myriad ways in which race-racism is implicated in the pursuit and intensification of capital accumulation, as well as in the responses formed in opposition to it. Guilloud's (and many of her CoR colleagues') embrace of globalizations bears witness to the salience of this approach across movements, including ones more critically engaged in questions about power and justice. CoR participants cast a wide net in their analysis of race-racism and globalization, and address diverse themes in their contributions to the site, including free trade, privatization of public services, war and terrorism, immigration, marginalization of indigenous communities, environmental justice, colonialism, American/AngloSaxon imperialism, North-South relations, as well as same-sex marriage, prisons, punk rock, and black liberation. This essay attempts to contribute to this already lively debate by examining the work of race-racism in constitutions of one popularly touted globalization, global environmentalism. Referencing work by Richard Dyer, Hazel Carby, bell hooks, Ali Rattansi, and others, I bring attention to the ways in which sex-race anxieties shape explanations of global environmental degradation, as well as responses formed and promoted by environmentalists. I make no claims to represent the full breadth of activities, conversations, and ideas that comprise environmentalism, nor do I provide a full analysis of the movements' many conflicts and contradictions. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".