397 AN EVALUATION OF COOKING FOR YOUR LIFE!, AN INNOVATIVE NUTRITIONAL EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR ADOLESCENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h3>Background</h3> Type 2 diabetes (T2D) among youth is a public health problem where there is great potential to improve primary and secondary prevention. Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is often diagnosed prior to the development of overt T2D, and without treatment, approximately 50% of patients with IGT will go on to develop T2D within 5 years. The first line of therapy for both conditions is healthy eating and regular physical activity. The Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) developed <i>Cooking for Your Life!</i> (<i>CFYL!</i>): classes that teach healthy cooking and eating for adults with T2D. For the pediatric population, there are currently very few nutrition education programs. Previous studies have shown that family-based behavior management strategies are effective interventions for weight management in children. <h3>Objective</h3> To assess the attendance rate and educational satisfaction of adolescents with T2D or IGT and their family members during a <i>CFYL!</i> youth and family program. <h3>Design</h3> The existing CDA <i>CFYL!</i> course was modified for adolescents with T2D or IGT and their families. The <i>CFYL!</i> program consists of three 3-hour cooking classes and a 2-hour class involving a Shop Smart Tour. This 4-week community-based hands-on nutrition and cooking program is co-facilitated by a dietitian and a cook on Saturday afternoons. Attendance was tracked at each of the classes. At the end of the 4 classes, each participant answered a questionnaire to assess their satisfaction with the classes. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 32 people from 16 families participated; 16 adolescents with T2D or IGT and 17parents/grandparents/siblings. 26/33 participants (79%) attended at least 3 of the 4 classes, and 15/16 adolescents attended at least 3 of the 4 classes. 28/31 were mostly or completely satisfied with the teaching, 28/31 enjoyed the program9s recipes, and 22/31 indicated that they would be interested in attending a second set of classes. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The youth and family <i>CFYL!</i> program is one of the few nutritional education programs available to youth with T2D and IGT. The program had good attendance from both the adolescents and their families. The majority of the participants were satisfied with the course, enjoyed the recipes, and would be interested in taking a second set of classes. These results suggest that both adolescents and their families can commit to this <i>CFYL!</i> educational program.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».