397 AN EVALUATION OF COOKING FOR YOUR LIFE!, AN INNOVATIVE NUTRITIONAL EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR ADOLESCENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>Background</h3> Type 2 diabetes (T2D) among youth is a public health problem where there is great potential to improve primary and secondary prevention. Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is often diagnosed prior to the development of overt T2D, and without treatment, approximately 50% of patients with IGT will go on to develop T2D within 5 years. The first line of therapy for both conditions is healthy eating and regular physical activity. The Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) developed <i>Cooking for Your Life!</i> (<i>CFYL!</i>): classes that teach healthy cooking and eating for adults with T2D. For the pediatric population, there are currently very few nutrition education programs. Previous studies have shown that family-based behavior management strategies are effective interventions for weight management in children. <h3>Objective</h3> To assess the attendance rate and educational satisfaction of adolescents with T2D or IGT and their family members during a <i>CFYL!</i> youth and family program. <h3>Design</h3> The existing CDA <i>CFYL!</i> course was modified for adolescents with T2D or IGT and their families. The <i>CFYL!</i> program consists of three 3-hour cooking classes and a 2-hour class involving a Shop Smart Tour. This 4-week community-based hands-on nutrition and cooking program is co-facilitated by a dietitian and a cook on Saturday afternoons. Attendance was tracked at each of the classes. At the end of the 4 classes, each participant answered a questionnaire to assess their satisfaction with the classes. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 32 people from 16 families participated; 16 adolescents with T2D or IGT and 17parents/grandparents/siblings. 26/33 participants (79%) attended at least 3 of the 4 classes, and 15/16 adolescents attended at least 3 of the 4 classes. 28/31 were mostly or completely satisfied with the teaching, 28/31 enjoyed the program9s recipes, and 22/31 indicated that they would be interested in attending a second set of classes. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The youth and family <i>CFYL!</i> program is one of the few nutritional education programs available to youth with T2D and IGT. The program had good attendance from both the adolescents and their families. The majority of the participants were satisfied with the course, enjoyed the recipes, and would be interested in taking a second set of classes. These results suggest that both adolescents and their families can commit to this <i>CFYL!</i> educational program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".