Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In reviewing the 90 year history of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine since its birth in 1926, one is struck by the forward thinking of many of its editorial board members over the decades. Not surprisingly, innovations that were imaginative and novel at the time of their inception in past decades are now often taken for granted and their sources long forgotten.The current editorial board has continued this creative tradition of the journal and instituted multiple advances of its own. No one has contributed more in this regards, often behind the scenes, than Jerad M. Gardner, MD, currently an assistant professor of pathology and dermatology at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock.In 2009, Dr. Gardner created the Facebook account for the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine and initially administered this account (https://www.facebook.com/groups/179133725966/). In recent years, he brought to Archives readers concepts about the use of smart phones for microscopic photography (http://www.archivesofpathology.org/doi/pdf/10.5858/arpa.2013-0425-ED and http://www.archivesofpathology.org/doi/pdf/10.5858/arpa.2014-0315-RA). As associate editor for Emerging Technologies and Techniques, Dr. Gardner has led a talented group of digital experts who have assisted with the Archives pioneering use of digital imaging in addition to serving as more traditional section editors.In addition to the Archives, Dr. Gardner's work has impacted several professional societies and multiple other venues. The lives of most practicing pathologists have been touched by Dr. Gardner directly or indirectly, whether they know it or not. Dr. Gardner has been the premier champion and visionary for the application of social media, mobile devices, and other new technologies to diagnostic pathology practice, professional and lay public education, academic collaboration, professional society outreach (most notably the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology and the American Society of Dermatopathology in addition to the College of American Pathologists), patient support groups (16 sarcoma and cutaneous lymphoma groups at last count), and more.In this 90th year of the journal, we are pleased to announce that Dr. Jerad Gardner has joined the eminent group of deputy editors-in-chief serving the Archives (Gregory Y. Lauwers, MD, Jennifer L. Hunt, MD, Sanja Dacic, MD, PhD, Raouf E. Nakhleh, MD, and, most recently, Fan Lin, MD, PhD). In conjunction with this, Dr. Gardner has created the Archives Twitter account @ArchivesPath and guided the establishment of a group of social media section editors.Dr. Gardner has been a mentor to an astonishing number of people through his multiple venues. Dr. Gardner is my mentor. He has much to teach all of us.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».