FANCD2-associated Nuclease 1, but Not Exonuclease 1 or Flap Endonuclease 1, Is Able to Unhook DNA Interstrand Cross-links in Vitro
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cisplatin and its derivatives, nitrogen mustards and mitomycin C, are used widely in cancer chemotherapy. Their efficacy is linked primarily to their ability to generate DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs), which effectively block the progression of transcription and replication machineries. Release of this block, referred to as unhooking, has been postulated to require endonucleases that incise one strand of the duplex on either side of the ICL. Here we investigated how the 5′ flap nucleases FANCD2-associated nuclease 1 (FAN1), exonuclease 1 (EXO1), and flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) process a substrate reminiscent of a replication fork arrested at an ICL. We now show that EXO1 and FEN1 cleaved the substrate at the boundary between the single-stranded 5′ flap and the duplex, whereas FAN1 incised it three to four nucleotides in the double-stranded region. This affected the outcome of processing of a substrate containing a nitrogen mustard-like ICL two nucleotides in the duplex region because FAN1, unlike EXO1 and FEN1, incised the substrate predominantly beyond the ICL and, therefore, failed to release the 5′ flap. We also show that FAN1 was able to degrade a linear ICL substrate. This ability of FAN1 to traverse ICLs in DNA could help to elucidate its biological function, which is currently unknown. Cisplatin and its derivatives, nitrogen mustards and mitomycin C, are used widely in cancer chemotherapy. Their efficacy is linked primarily to their ability to generate DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs), which effectively block the progression of transcription and replication machineries. Release of this block, referred to as unhooking, has been postulated to require endonucleases that incise one strand of the duplex on either side of the ICL. Here we investigated how the 5′ flap nucleases FANCD2-associated nuclease 1 (FAN1), exonuclease 1 (EXO1), and flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) process a substrate reminiscent of a replication fork arrested at an ICL. We now show that EXO1 and FEN1 cleaved the substrate at the boundary between the single-stranded 5′ flap and the duplex, whereas FAN1 incised it three to four nucleotides in the double-stranded region. This affected the outcome of processing of a substrate containing a nitrogen mustard-like ICL two nucleotides in the duplex region because FAN1, unlike EXO1 and FEN1, incised the substrate predominantly beyond the ICL and, therefore, failed to release the 5′ flap. We also show that FAN1 was able to degrade a linear ICL substrate. This ability of FAN1 to traverse ICLs in DNA could help to elucidate its biological function, which is currently unknown.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».