[Cognitive inhibition and psychopathology: toward a less simplistic conceptualization].
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
"Cognitive inhibition" is a concept that has found a firm place in the interpretation of performance by normal subjects on tasks involving adherence to a plan and suppression of incorrect responses to distractors. The presence of "negative priming" is the classical indicator of cognitive inhibition. Negative priming occurs when, in a sequence of stimuli each of which is composed of a target and a distractor, the distractor of the first stimulus becomes the target of the second stimulus: reaction time to the second stimulus is slowed because of the inhibition applied to the distractor of the first stimulus. The concept has been extended to the interpretation of pathological behavior and symptoms. Pathological subjects have been found to show deficient negative priming. Thus, negative ideation in depression as well as intrusive paranoid associations in schizophrenia have been related to a deficit in the capacity to inhibit inappropriate representations. In this paper, we briefly review some of the experimental evidence from normal subjects that has contributed to the acceptance of cognitive inhibition as a key process in the control of normal cognition, as well as more recent evidence that has led to a revision of the concept. Negative priming in normal subjects has been found to be dependent upon characteristics of the experimental situation as perceived by the subject. In particular, priming is observed when the subject anticipates difficulty in determining the response and proceeds with caution. Thus, inhibition is not an automatic "brake" applied to irrelevant material, but rather the product of strategic considerations within the experimental situation. This revision of the cognitive inhibition hypothesis leads to a re-interpretation of the apparently deficient cognitive inhibition seen in depressed or schizophrenic subjects. According to this more recent interpretation, deficient cognitive inhibition in pathological subjects can be seen as a less adaptive strategic adjustment to the task. The pathology seems to touch higher-level executive functions rather than a deficient inhibitory "brake". In depressed subjects, abnormal performance in selective attention tasks could be related to the underlying pathology in two ways: some depressed subjects show a marked lack of energy and a psychomotor slowing: these subjects do not exhibit normal negative priming, probably because of a reduction of cognitive resources. Other depressed subjects show abnormal performance as reflected by negative priming greater than normal: this result could be related to an exaggerated tendency to verify a correct response. Schizophrenic subjects show a lack of negative priming that seems most plausibly to be related to an ineffectual integration of the experimental instructions concerning both speed and accuracy in the response. This re-interpretation of the cognitive deficiency in pathological patients provides a better fit with recent experimental results from normal subjects, and with cognitive deficits measured in pathological subjects.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,029 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».