[Cognitive inhibition and psychopathology: toward a less simplistic conceptualization].
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Cognitive inhibition" is a concept that has found a firm place in the interpretation of performance by normal subjects on tasks involving adherence to a plan and suppression of incorrect responses to distractors. The presence of "negative priming" is the classical indicator of cognitive inhibition. Negative priming occurs when, in a sequence of stimuli each of which is composed of a target and a distractor, the distractor of the first stimulus becomes the target of the second stimulus: reaction time to the second stimulus is slowed because of the inhibition applied to the distractor of the first stimulus. The concept has been extended to the interpretation of pathological behavior and symptoms. Pathological subjects have been found to show deficient negative priming. Thus, negative ideation in depression as well as intrusive paranoid associations in schizophrenia have been related to a deficit in the capacity to inhibit inappropriate representations. In this paper, we briefly review some of the experimental evidence from normal subjects that has contributed to the acceptance of cognitive inhibition as a key process in the control of normal cognition, as well as more recent evidence that has led to a revision of the concept. Negative priming in normal subjects has been found to be dependent upon characteristics of the experimental situation as perceived by the subject. In particular, priming is observed when the subject anticipates difficulty in determining the response and proceeds with caution. Thus, inhibition is not an automatic "brake" applied to irrelevant material, but rather the product of strategic considerations within the experimental situation. This revision of the cognitive inhibition hypothesis leads to a re-interpretation of the apparently deficient cognitive inhibition seen in depressed or schizophrenic subjects. According to this more recent interpretation, deficient cognitive inhibition in pathological subjects can be seen as a less adaptive strategic adjustment to the task. The pathology seems to touch higher-level executive functions rather than a deficient inhibitory "brake". In depressed subjects, abnormal performance in selective attention tasks could be related to the underlying pathology in two ways: some depressed subjects show a marked lack of energy and a psychomotor slowing: these subjects do not exhibit normal negative priming, probably because of a reduction of cognitive resources. Other depressed subjects show abnormal performance as reflected by negative priming greater than normal: this result could be related to an exaggerated tendency to verify a correct response. Schizophrenic subjects show a lack of negative priming that seems most plausibly to be related to an ineffectual integration of the experimental instructions concerning both speed and accuracy in the response. This re-interpretation of the cognitive deficiency in pathological patients provides a better fit with recent experimental results from normal subjects, and with cognitive deficits measured in pathological subjects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it