The Patriotic Consensus: Unity, Morale, and the Second World War in Winnipeg by Jody Perrun
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Patriotic Consensus: Unity, Morale, and the Second World War in Winnipeg by Jody Perrun Timothy C. Winegard The Patriotic Consensus: Unity, Morale, and the Second World War in Winnipeg. By Jody Perrun. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2014. vii + 292 pp. Illustrations, tables, maps, notes, bibliography, index. $31.95 paper. In The Patriotic Consensus: Unity, Morale, and the Second World War in Winnipeg, author Jody Perrun sets out to focus on human activity at the community level in Winnipeg during the period of total war between 1939 and 1945, in order “to better understand the significance of local responses to national policies” (11). The aim of this work, in his words, “is to explore two general questions. The first pertains to unity, and the extent to which Winnipeg-gers pulled together in a time of national crisis. … The second concerns morale.” (12). The author navigates the answers to both questions successfully, using a variety of excellent local and national archival sources, as well as a sound selection of secondary sources. Within the six thematic chapters of the book, Perrun is careful to include the voices, opinions, and actions of the various groups (aside from Aboriginals, who receive scant attention) who made up Winnipeg’s cultural and ethnic mosaic. There is also a strong women’s voice woven into the overall narrative. Another strength of this work is Perrun’s explanation and integration of local and national organizations, including private or nongovernment organizations in what he labels the effort of “pulling together” (145). An additional asset of the book is its constant reminder to the reader of a community involved at a local level within the paradigm of national and international total war, and the complete mobilization of all local resources to benefit the war effort and the investment in victory. The obvious drawback of the book is its sole focus on Winnipeg, which detracts from its appeal to a wider audience outside Winnipeg, and perhaps Manitoba. Conversely, while the emphasis is on the community of Winnipeg, the author includes too much extraneous information detailing other Manitoban and Canadian communities—and also national information—to support his arguments. This detracts from the book. These minor critiques aside, Perrun has written an excellent study on the influences and responses to total war at the local level in Canada through the medium of Winnipeg. By focusing on a microcosm of the nation-state, the diverse voices of the community speak through the pages and the war becomes more real. [End Page 147] Timothy C. Winegard Colorado Mesa University Copyright © 2016 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».