The Patriotic Consensus: Unity, Morale, and the Second World War in Winnipeg by Jody Perrun
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: The Patriotic Consensus: Unity, Morale, and the Second World War in Winnipeg by Jody Perrun Timothy C. Winegard The Patriotic Consensus: Unity, Morale, and the Second World War in Winnipeg. By Jody Perrun. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2014. vii + 292 pp. Illustrations, tables, maps, notes, bibliography, index. $31.95 paper. In The Patriotic Consensus: Unity, Morale, and the Second World War in Winnipeg, author Jody Perrun sets out to focus on human activity at the community level in Winnipeg during the period of total war between 1939 and 1945, in order “to better understand the significance of local responses to national policies” (11). The aim of this work, in his words, “is to explore two general questions. The first pertains to unity, and the extent to which Winnipeg-gers pulled together in a time of national crisis. … The second concerns morale.” (12). The author navigates the answers to both questions successfully, using a variety of excellent local and national archival sources, as well as a sound selection of secondary sources. Within the six thematic chapters of the book, Perrun is careful to include the voices, opinions, and actions of the various groups (aside from Aboriginals, who receive scant attention) who made up Winnipeg’s cultural and ethnic mosaic. There is also a strong women’s voice woven into the overall narrative. Another strength of this work is Perrun’s explanation and integration of local and national organizations, including private or nongovernment organizations in what he labels the effort of “pulling together” (145). An additional asset of the book is its constant reminder to the reader of a community involved at a local level within the paradigm of national and international total war, and the complete mobilization of all local resources to benefit the war effort and the investment in victory. The obvious drawback of the book is its sole focus on Winnipeg, which detracts from its appeal to a wider audience outside Winnipeg, and perhaps Manitoba. Conversely, while the emphasis is on the community of Winnipeg, the author includes too much extraneous information detailing other Manitoban and Canadian communities—and also national information—to support his arguments. This detracts from the book. These minor critiques aside, Perrun has written an excellent study on the influences and responses to total war at the local level in Canada through the medium of Winnipeg. By focusing on a microcosm of the nation-state, the diverse voices of the community speak through the pages and the war becomes more real. [End Page 147] Timothy C. Winegard Colorado Mesa University Copyright © 2016 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".