Biologicals and switch in rheumatoid arthritis throughout time - are we being more aggressive?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the switches performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biological therapy and specifically comparing the switches from earlier days with more recent switches. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biological therapy followed at Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, and included in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.Pt) were included in this study. Switches occurring before and after January 2007 were compared with respect to patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, such as disease activity and duration of biological therapy. The survival of the first biological agent was compared between patients starting biological therapy before and after 2007. EULAR response and remission rate at the last evaluation were calculated. Comparisons between groups were established using a t-test or chi--square, as appropriate. Survival curves of the first biological were compared through the logrank test. RESULTS: In total, 123 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 57.0 ± 13.1 years and mean disease duration 11.7 ± 8.0 years). A total of 85 switches were documented, 20% of which took place before 2007. Comparing the switches before and after 2007, the latter were registered among older patients (recent switches 56.2 ± 12.9 years vs older switches 48.9 ± 11.0 years, p=0.04) and with a shorter duration of the first biological agent (recent switches 461.9 ± 293.2 days vs older switches 773.7 ± 475.8 days, p=0.03). No further significant differences were found, including the disease activity. The survival of the first biological was shorter in patients starting biological therapy after 2007 (2949 days for biological onset before 2007 and 818 days for onset after 2007, p <0.001). A good EULAR response was achieved by 19% and 30% of the patients, before and after 2007, respectively (p = 0.23). Remission was achieved by 14% and 22% of the patients, before and after 2007, respectively (p = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Switches were more frequently performed in more recent years, in older patients and with a shorter duration of biological therapy. A trend towards a better and more targeted control of the disease could be discussed in light of our results. Although switches were more frequently performed in more recent years, in older patients and with a shorter duration of biological therapy, there is still room for improvement when aiming at remission, for example by applying a tighter therapy strategy like the "treat to target model".
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».