Biologicals and switch in rheumatoid arthritis throughout time - are we being more aggressive?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the switches performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biological therapy and specifically comparing the switches from earlier days with more recent switches. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biological therapy followed at Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, and included in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.Pt) were included in this study. Switches occurring before and after January 2007 were compared with respect to patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, such as disease activity and duration of biological therapy. The survival of the first biological agent was compared between patients starting biological therapy before and after 2007. EULAR response and remission rate at the last evaluation were calculated. Comparisons between groups were established using a t-test or chi--square, as appropriate. Survival curves of the first biological were compared through the logrank test. RESULTS: In total, 123 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 57.0 ± 13.1 years and mean disease duration 11.7 ± 8.0 years). A total of 85 switches were documented, 20% of which took place before 2007. Comparing the switches before and after 2007, the latter were registered among older patients (recent switches 56.2 ± 12.9 years vs older switches 48.9 ± 11.0 years, p=0.04) and with a shorter duration of the first biological agent (recent switches 461.9 ± 293.2 days vs older switches 773.7 ± 475.8 days, p=0.03). No further significant differences were found, including the disease activity. The survival of the first biological was shorter in patients starting biological therapy after 2007 (2949 days for biological onset before 2007 and 818 days for onset after 2007, p <0.001). A good EULAR response was achieved by 19% and 30% of the patients, before and after 2007, respectively (p = 0.23). Remission was achieved by 14% and 22% of the patients, before and after 2007, respectively (p = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Switches were more frequently performed in more recent years, in older patients and with a shorter duration of biological therapy. A trend towards a better and more targeted control of the disease could be discussed in light of our results. Although switches were more frequently performed in more recent years, in older patients and with a shorter duration of biological therapy, there is still room for improvement when aiming at remission, for example by applying a tighter therapy strategy like the "treat to target model".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".