Notice bibliographique
Résumé
At first glance A. B. and B. B. McKinney, even though they shared alphabetical initials and the biblical middle name of Benjamin, may seem an odd couple to be paired in a hymnological study: * born nearly two decades before the Civil War; McKinney born more than two decades after it. * born in Canada and lived mainly in northern states; McKinney a southerner. * began as a Presbyterian, and then founded the Christian and Missionary Alliance; McKinney a lifelong Southern Baptist. * Simpson's schooling respectable enough for large downtown churches to vie in calling him as their pastor; McKinney's education, even though covering several years and several levels, came in bits and pieces, and ended up with a correspondence school diploma. (McKinney later received an honorary doctorate; declined a similar degree, but people started calling him Dr. Simpson anyway.) * ministered as a pastor, preacher, promoter of world missions, and founder of a movement that eventually became a new denomination; McKinney a layman, and his ministry almost entirely in the field of church music. * a sensitive, serious, scholarly man, passionate yet dignified; McKinney an inveterate tease, a big, jovial warm fuzzy who easily made friends with children. Apparently the two men never met. Their paths seem never to have crossed, although their life spans overlapped by more than thirty years. Why, then, have their names been linked in this article? Because in several significant ways and McKinney were indeed alike: * Each an unashamed evangelical who tried to lead others into a personal relationship with God through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ and through a conscious and deepening awareness of God's Holy Spirit. * Each gave a significant amount of time and energy to teaching in evangelical institutions of higher learning, as well as to producing hymnals and other Christian publications. * Each a visionary leader who often needed to call on the dedication and skills of others to clothe his dreams in reality; of each it could have been said what once said of McKinney, that he was successful in gathering people around him who could fill in his gaps.1 * Each an impressive platform personality, frequently leading in camp meetings, summer conferences, and conventions; both were tall men of commanding presence. * Each loved and appreciated the older hymns, but wanted people of their own day to enjoy popular gospel songs as well. * Each produced a significant body of gospel songs, both texts and tunes, yet theirs is a limited hymnody. The word limited here has more than one meaning. Limitations as to the scope of their work and the intrinsic merit of it will be addressed later in this article; even more, however, limited refers to the fact that the hymns of each of them have been little known outside their own respective faith traditions. Those two denominations are, of course, the Christian and Missionary Alliance (hereafter referred to as or Alliance) and the Southern Baptist Convention (hereafter referred to as or simply Baptist). In past years both gospel songs and McKinney gospel songs have been included in commercial and denominational hymnals outside their own circles, but this apparently a temporary development, as later collections have tended to drop most of them again. Certain CMA churches and convocations still ring the changes on hymns; so do certain SBC congregations when they sing the hymns of McKinney. Yet, nearly a century after Simpson's death and well over half a century since McKinney' s, the hymnody of neither man has broken free from its limitations. And with the present widespread trend toward contemporary Christian praise songs, the hymnody of both men seems likely to suffer further eclipse. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».