Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This is an excellent first publication in a promised series of five edited INED volumes on theory and demography.These edited volumes are designed "to support and enrich the theoretical side of demographic thinking and discussion."Each volume is to have 20 "fundamental texts" that have advanced demographic thinking, providing bases for analysis and understanding of associated phenomena.Other volumes in the series will consider fertility, nuptiality and family, mortality, and demographic regimes.The editors are asked to collect basic texts that define the common theoretical heritage of demography writ large.Victor Piché is the ideal editor for this volume on migration, having spent a career researching migration in both South and North, and having taught a course on the topic over the years at Université de Montréal.I have never seen such a thorough introduction to an edited volume.Professor Piché builds this first chapter through an analysis that brings together sequentially the 20 chapters, following an analytic framework that both compares and gives value to the selected texts.In so doing, he refers to some 140 references, including the 20 original publications contained in the volume.No less than 11 of these references are to Piché's earlier publications, but only the introductory chapter of the present book is authored by the Editor.It is of interest that two of the articles are from the 1960s, four from the 1970s, nine from the 1980s, three from the 1990s, and the most recent two carry the date of 2000.Also of interest is that 19 of the 20 are here translated, having been originally published in English.The Editor makes considerable use of the two "paradigms" that he sees as dominating the post-war literature until the end of the 1980s: one based on the functionalist approach in sociology and neoliberal economics, and the other on macro-structural approaches of Marxist inspiration (p.17).The two major sections of the book focus on the origins and causes of migration and on the effects of migration.Piché adapts an integrating conceptual framework from Goldlust and Richmond that appeared in the 1974 issue of International Migration Review 8(2) to bring together the various factors of migration and integration, at the macro and micro levels (p.50).One of the important adaptations is to give more centrality to gender in thinking about migration.For an English version of Piche's integrating conceptual framework, see his chapter on immigration and integration in developed countries in Caselli et al. (2006).The last section of the book addresses the politics of migration, particularly the rights of migrants, including the right to both emigrate and immigrate.He sees an emerging paradigm based on the globalization of migration flows, in line with more open flows of capital, goods, and services.In the last section of the introduction, the Editor observes developments in the European Union, West Africa, and Latin America that have allowed freer movement within these areas.In my view, there could be more recognition of the importance of reasonable similarities in levels of income within these regions, and of the inter-regional economic redistributions that have made the European case viable as an open-migration area.As European states have appreciated, open migration also brings pressure to achieve similarity in social policy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,021 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».