MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2461079124 · doi:10.25336/p6wc8w

Les théories de la migration

2015· article· fr· W2461079124 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Roderic Beaujot

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Studies in Population · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyGeographyHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is an excellent first publication in a promised series of five edited INED volumes on theory and demography.These edited volumes are designed "to support and enrich the theoretical side of demographic thinking and discussion."Each volume is to have 20 "fundamental texts" that have advanced demographic thinking, providing bases for analysis and understanding of associated phenomena.Other volumes in the series will consider fertility, nuptiality and family, mortality, and demographic regimes.The editors are asked to collect basic texts that define the common theoretical heritage of demography writ large.Victor Piché is the ideal editor for this volume on migration, having spent a career researching migration in both South and North, and having taught a course on the topic over the years at Université de Montréal.I have never seen such a thorough introduction to an edited volume.Professor Piché builds this first chapter through an analysis that brings together sequentially the 20 chapters, following an analytic framework that both compares and gives value to the selected texts.In so doing, he refers to some 140 references, including the 20 original publications contained in the volume.No less than 11 of these references are to Piché's earlier publications, but only the introductory chapter of the present book is authored by the Editor.It is of interest that two of the articles are from the 1960s, four from the 1970s, nine from the 1980s, three from the 1990s, and the most recent two carry the date of 2000.Also of interest is that 19 of the 20 are here translated, having been originally published in English.The Editor makes considerable use of the two "paradigms" that he sees as dominating the post-war literature until the end of the 1980s: one based on the functionalist approach in sociology and neoliberal economics, and the other on macro-structural approaches of Marxist inspiration (p.17).The two major sections of the book focus on the origins and causes of migration and on the effects of migration.Piché adapts an integrating conceptual framework from Goldlust and Richmond that appeared in the 1974 issue of International Migration Review 8(2) to bring together the various factors of migration and integration, at the macro and micro levels (p.50).One of the important adaptations is to give more centrality to gender in thinking about migration.For an English version of Piche's integrating conceptual framework, see his chapter on immigration and integration in developed countries in Caselli et al. (2006).The last section of the book addresses the politics of migration, particularly the rights of migrants, including the right to both emigrate and immigrate.He sees an emerging paradigm based on the globalization of migration flows, in line with more open flows of capital, goods, and services.In the last section of the introduction, the Editor observes developments in the European Union, West Africa, and Latin America that have allowed freer movement within these areas.In my view, there could be more recognition of the importance of reasonable similarities in levels of income within these regions, and of the inter-regional economic redistributions that have made the European case viable as an open-migration area.As European states have appreciated, open migration also brings pressure to achieve similarity in social policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.021
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.304
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Studies in PopulationSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207