MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2464166050 · doi:10.1097/01.cot.0000489510.73013.42

Chemoradiation & Temozolomide for Patients With Glioblastoma

2016· article· en· W2464166050 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Romi Herron-Cologna

Notice bibliographique

RevueOncology Times · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTemozolomideMedicineRadiation therapyOncologyInternal medicineGlioblastomaClinical trialChemotherapyCancerDacarbazineQuality of life (healthcare)Randomized controlled trialCancer researchNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

glioblastoma: glioblastomaCHICAGO—In the first study testing the use of both temozolomide and radiation in older adults with glioblastoma, side effects were slightly greater among patients receiving temozolomide, and overall quality of life was similar in both patient groups. The combination was also found to increase the survival period (Abstract LBA2). Lead study co-author James R. Perry, MD, FRCPC, The Crolla Family Endowed Chair in Brain Tumour Research at the Odette Cancer and Sunnybrook Health Science Centres in Toronto, Canada, recently presented the data at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting. The international test was led by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) collaborated with the CCTG on the trial. Study Results In the randomized phase III trial, temozolomide (Temodar) chemotherapy was added during short-course radiation therapy. Monthly maintenance doses of temozolomide followed and significantly improved survival of elderly patients with glioblastoma. Risk of death was reduced by 33 percent. The study enrolled 562 patients 65 years and older. All had been newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. The median patient age was 73 years and two-thirds were older than 70 years. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two categories: short course radiation therapy (40Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, or radiation therapy alone. Findings showed that chemoradiation (treatment combining chemotherapy with radiation therapy) extended the median overall survival from 7.6 months with radiation therapy alone to 9.3 months. In addition, the combination slowed the tumor growth in the temozolomide group, with median progression-free survival of 5.3 months versus 3.9 months. “Although the difference in median survival seems modest, temozolomide significantly increased the chances of surviving 2 or 3 years. For an individual patient, that can mean being able to be part of another family holiday or celebration,” said Perry. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 37.8 percent and 10.4 percent with radiation plus temozolomide versus 22.2 percent and 2.8 percent with radiation therapy alone. For patients with a genetic abnormality, MGMT promoter methylation, the benefit of temozolomide was greater. For the subset of 165 patients, longer survival was found. The median overall survival was 13.5 months with temozolomide compared with 7.7 months of only radiation therapy. Also, patients treated with temozolomide had a 47 percent lower risk of death. The study also analyzed quality of life. Standardized questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and BN20 showed no difference in physical, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning between the two groups. More nausea, vomiting, and constipation were experienced by patients who received temozolomide than those who received radiation alone. Practice Implications Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, is among the top five causes of death due to cancer. The average age of diagnosis is 64 years. In the U.S., an estimated 12,120 people will be diagnosed with the disease this year according to the American Brain Tumor Association. “Glioblastoma is frequently diagnosed in older individuals, and these are important data showing that our best therapies can work and be tolerable for elderly patients,” said Brian Alexander, MD, MPH, ASCO expert in brain cancers. “It's good to have an option to offer patients that we know can have a positive impact, though still physicians and their patients need to weigh the benefits of this approach carefully.” “I think this is really important in that we are testing in the population that actually gets the disease, the older population,” emphasized ASCO President Julie M. Vose, MD, MBA, FASCO, of University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, who served as the plenary briefing moderator. “It's very important that we target the population that (is affected).” “Although glioblastoma disproportionately affects older patients, there are no clear guidelines for treating these patients, and practice varies globally,” concluded Perry. “This study provides the first evidence from a randomized clinical trial that chemotherapy in combination with a shorter radiation schedule significantly extends survival without a detriment to quality of life.” Romi Herron-Cologna is a contributing writer.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOncology TimesMême sujetGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207