MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chemoradiation & Temozolomide for Patients With Glioblastoma

2016· article· en· W2464166050 on OpenAlex
Romi Herron-Cologna

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology Times · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideMedicineRadiation therapyOncologyInternal medicineGlioblastomaClinical trialChemotherapyCancerDacarbazineQuality of life (healthcare)Randomized controlled trialCancer researchNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

glioblastoma: glioblastomaCHICAGO—In the first study testing the use of both temozolomide and radiation in older adults with glioblastoma, side effects were slightly greater among patients receiving temozolomide, and overall quality of life was similar in both patient groups. The combination was also found to increase the survival period (Abstract LBA2). Lead study co-author James R. Perry, MD, FRCPC, The Crolla Family Endowed Chair in Brain Tumour Research at the Odette Cancer and Sunnybrook Health Science Centres in Toronto, Canada, recently presented the data at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting. The international test was led by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) collaborated with the CCTG on the trial. Study Results In the randomized phase III trial, temozolomide (Temodar) chemotherapy was added during short-course radiation therapy. Monthly maintenance doses of temozolomide followed and significantly improved survival of elderly patients with glioblastoma. Risk of death was reduced by 33 percent. The study enrolled 562 patients 65 years and older. All had been newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. The median patient age was 73 years and two-thirds were older than 70 years. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two categories: short course radiation therapy (40Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, or radiation therapy alone. Findings showed that chemoradiation (treatment combining chemotherapy with radiation therapy) extended the median overall survival from 7.6 months with radiation therapy alone to 9.3 months. In addition, the combination slowed the tumor growth in the temozolomide group, with median progression-free survival of 5.3 months versus 3.9 months. “Although the difference in median survival seems modest, temozolomide significantly increased the chances of surviving 2 or 3 years. For an individual patient, that can mean being able to be part of another family holiday or celebration,” said Perry. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 37.8 percent and 10.4 percent with radiation plus temozolomide versus 22.2 percent and 2.8 percent with radiation therapy alone. For patients with a genetic abnormality, MGMT promoter methylation, the benefit of temozolomide was greater. For the subset of 165 patients, longer survival was found. The median overall survival was 13.5 months with temozolomide compared with 7.7 months of only radiation therapy. Also, patients treated with temozolomide had a 47 percent lower risk of death. The study also analyzed quality of life. Standardized questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and BN20 showed no difference in physical, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning between the two groups. More nausea, vomiting, and constipation were experienced by patients who received temozolomide than those who received radiation alone. Practice Implications Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, is among the top five causes of death due to cancer. The average age of diagnosis is 64 years. In the U.S., an estimated 12,120 people will be diagnosed with the disease this year according to the American Brain Tumor Association. “Glioblastoma is frequently diagnosed in older individuals, and these are important data showing that our best therapies can work and be tolerable for elderly patients,” said Brian Alexander, MD, MPH, ASCO expert in brain cancers. “It's good to have an option to offer patients that we know can have a positive impact, though still physicians and their patients need to weigh the benefits of this approach carefully.” “I think this is really important in that we are testing in the population that actually gets the disease, the older population,” emphasized ASCO President Julie M. Vose, MD, MBA, FASCO, of University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, who served as the plenary briefing moderator. “It's very important that we target the population that (is affected).” “Although glioblastoma disproportionately affects older patients, there are no clear guidelines for treating these patients, and practice varies globally,” concluded Perry. “This study provides the first evidence from a randomized clinical trial that chemotherapy in combination with a shorter radiation schedule significantly extends survival without a detriment to quality of life.” Romi Herron-Cologna is a contributing writer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it