MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2466446895 · doi:10.1111/jpc.13012

Pocketing of food in cheeks during eating in an adolescent with <scp>CHARGE</scp> syndrome

2015· letter· en· W2466446895 sur OpenAlexaff
Alexandra Hudson, Mackenzie Colp, Kim Blake

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health · 2015
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChokingMedicineCHARGE syndromeSwallowingDysphagiaPediatricsEating disordersSurgeryPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

We would like to draw your attention to a problematic feeding behaviour that has not previously been described in CHARGE syndrome. A 17-year-old female adolescent with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of CHARGE syndrome and many of the typical physical features of the genetic disorder (Table 1) presented to her general paediatrician's clinic with problems of over-stuffing her mouth and holding food in her cheeks during eating, which had led to choking incidents. The adolescent had experienced choking episodes during eating several times a year and had two severe choking episodes during her life that required the Heimlich maneuver to dislodge food. Hsu et al. 20141 Frequency (%) Yes (atresia, unilateral) (stenosis, unilateral) Yes (CNI – difficulty smelling; CNVII – facial palsy; CNVIII – hearing problems; CNIX, X, I – swallowing problems) Past medical history revealed that she was tube-fed until 13 years of age. Oral feeding was introduced at the age of 3 years. She continuously over-stuffed her mouth with all food textures and would pocket the food both in her cheeks and palate. Previous swallow studies had identified an unusual chewing pattern and uncoordinated swallow pattern where she double or triple swallowed for every bite. The adolescent needed close supervision, as well as a continuous reminder to chew and swallow, at each meal. The adolescent had extensive feeding therapy over her life, which included a speech language pathologist, occupational therapist and psychologist, but it did not successfully resolve her food pocketing feeding behaviour. Pocketing of food in cheeks or food packing has been described in the current literature as holding accepted food in the mouth without swallowing.2, 3 This eating behaviour has previously been described in children with autism.3 Feeding and swallowing problems are seen in many (>70%) infants with CHARGE syndrome, and of these, the majority have to be tube fed at some point. Many feeding issues seen in CHARGE syndrome such as problems with chewing, swallowing, reflux and aspiration may be due to cranial nerve dysfunction1, 4. Chaser use, food re-distribution and manipulation of food textures have been described in the literature as beneficial ways to reduce food pocketing in children with autism.2, 3 This is the first case to document food pocketing in an individual with CHARGE syndrome. It is important that feeding team therapy members and clinicians are aware of such eating behaviours in individuals with CHARGE syndrome, in addition to the already well-established physical features and symptoms of the syndrome. Clinicians should specifically target feeding therapy interventions to address food pocketing, as this feeding behaviour can still persist despite extensive general feeding therapy. We thank the patient and her mother for sharing their lives with us.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesIntégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Paediatrics and Child HealthMême sujetCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesTravaux en français237 207