MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466446895 · doi:10.1111/jpc.13012

Pocketing of food in cheeks during eating in an adolescent with <scp>CHARGE</scp> syndrome

2015· letter· en· W2466446895 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra Hudson, Mackenzie Colp, Kim Blake

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health · 2015
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChokingMedicineCHARGE syndromeSwallowingDysphagiaPediatricsEating disordersSurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We would like to draw your attention to a problematic feeding behaviour that has not previously been described in CHARGE syndrome. A 17-year-old female adolescent with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of CHARGE syndrome and many of the typical physical features of the genetic disorder (Table 1) presented to her general paediatrician's clinic with problems of over-stuffing her mouth and holding food in her cheeks during eating, which had led to choking incidents. The adolescent had experienced choking episodes during eating several times a year and had two severe choking episodes during her life that required the Heimlich maneuver to dislodge food. Hsu et al. 20141 Frequency (%) Yes (atresia, unilateral) (stenosis, unilateral) Yes (CNI – difficulty smelling; CNVII – facial palsy; CNVIII – hearing problems; CNIX, X, I – swallowing problems) Past medical history revealed that she was tube-fed until 13 years of age. Oral feeding was introduced at the age of 3 years. She continuously over-stuffed her mouth with all food textures and would pocket the food both in her cheeks and palate. Previous swallow studies had identified an unusual chewing pattern and uncoordinated swallow pattern where she double or triple swallowed for every bite. The adolescent needed close supervision, as well as a continuous reminder to chew and swallow, at each meal. The adolescent had extensive feeding therapy over her life, which included a speech language pathologist, occupational therapist and psychologist, but it did not successfully resolve her food pocketing feeding behaviour. Pocketing of food in cheeks or food packing has been described in the current literature as holding accepted food in the mouth without swallowing.2, 3 This eating behaviour has previously been described in children with autism.3 Feeding and swallowing problems are seen in many (>70%) infants with CHARGE syndrome, and of these, the majority have to be tube fed at some point. Many feeding issues seen in CHARGE syndrome such as problems with chewing, swallowing, reflux and aspiration may be due to cranial nerve dysfunction1, 4. Chaser use, food re-distribution and manipulation of food textures have been described in the literature as beneficial ways to reduce food pocketing in children with autism.2, 3 This is the first case to document food pocketing in an individual with CHARGE syndrome. It is important that feeding team therapy members and clinicians are aware of such eating behaviours in individuals with CHARGE syndrome, in addition to the already well-established physical features and symptoms of the syndrome. Clinicians should specifically target feeding therapy interventions to address food pocketing, as this feeding behaviour can still persist despite extensive general feeding therapy. We thank the patient and her mother for sharing their lives with us.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Paediatrics and Child HealthSame topicCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207